Light is converted gravity

[gravityblock]

Deleted due to being off-topic.

[newbie123]

The guy is not just pushing his theories on the internet, he has written several well respected books.  I have not read one book or article that was inspired and written by man that I did not find a few things I did not agree with.

Well, (apparently) Not recognizing the strong force is pretty big problem, since there is overwelming experimental evidence to prove it exists.

Even if it's in a peer review journal, it will still be his theory. 

That's right.   But getting a theory accepted in a peer review journal adds credibility, and shows he's open to criticism...  But his theories have some huge problems, and aren't compatible with proven physics..

Look how long it took mainstream physics to accept Einstein's theory on relativity.  Some to this day still do not accept it.

So far Einstein's theories have had an  incredible amount of accuracy  AND  supporting data/evidence, and there is absolutely no reason to believe they aren't valid theories at this point...  The difference between Einstein and most crank theoriests are 1.) he accepted criticism and really tried hard to push his theory in accepted ways...   2.) He was well aware of existing science (most crank theorists are not).

[newbie123]

There will never be a reference I can give you, that will not be someone else's theories or opinions, regardless where the information is being published from.  Do you realize that physicists to this date are still looking for more than 300 theorized particles, including the graviton, in order for their theories to be correct.

Where the hell are you getting all of your  information?   Physicists are still looking for 300 theorized particles? 

The Standard Model has been very successful at predicting the existence of particles and their behaviors (key word: PREDICTING)  and the only missing particle AFAIK is the Higgs Boson...   And the exact nature of the graviton is cutting edge theoretical quantum physics right now. 

[gravityblock]

Where the hell are you getting all of your  information?   Physicists are still looking for 300 theorized particles? 

The Standard Model has been very successful at predicting the existence of particles and their behaviors (key word: PREDICTING)  and the only missing particle AFAIK is the Higgs Boson...   And the exact nature of the graviton is cutting edge theoretical quantum physics right now.

I'm getting my information from people who can think own their own, without having other people to do their thinking for them.

You have a lot to learn.  I'll upload a video here soon, about all of the particles they are looking for.  Have to work for a few hours right now and don't have the time at the moment to look for it.

I think that the observations of lensing indicate that a quantum theory of gravity, based on gravitons interacting with every particle including individual photons, cannot be correct. For graviton interaction to be correct, a photon would have to follow a polygonal path as it passes a massive body, each segment of the polygon being, perhaps, of planck length.

[gravityblock]

Duplicate Post, sorry