Magnetic Resonance Devices based on Don Smith Concepts

[cognito]

Hi, I'm new here and I'm trying to simulate a Don Smith Generator. Don't know if this eventually can be simulated but I try.

First I took the transmitter part of the generator to let it free run on it's self resonance by using a NST low amps high voltage to charge a capacitor. The spark gap works as a voltage limiter and kicks the LC circuit into resonance. So the frequency from the NST is not the resonance frequency, only a pump.
When this happens it is circulating amps in the MHz frequency (AC wave). Then the wave can be received in the L2a/b coils.
Let me know what you think...

Regards,
cognito

[armagdn03]

I'm sorry armagedn if I pre-concluded your setup to be based one Smith's, its just that from what I've seen from him, center-positioning of the primary is very important (as opposed to the popular tesla coil), in addition to reverse winding.

Aha okey, bifilar, then not to cancel the magnetic field but (as in tesla's patent) to increase the voltage/charge and thus the total energy the coil can store...
When trying to picture the circuit of your coil system it actually seems quite complex, since you have both bifilar, center tap and center positioning of primary coil. Its really an interesting idea, and just as interesting a result 

And before I repeat the same mistake I did earlier in one of your videos, I'm not that knowledgeable in this area, I'm just trying to learn all I can 
Julian

Hello,

You are correct in your conclusion, however I never claimed to be replicating smith. I cannot say I have EVER done a replication, like to do my own thing. 

This is not a smith device. However this and other videos I have give a good idea into how such technology works. But if smith knew what he claimed I seriously doubt. I own his book, seen his many publications, watched all of his video, and am quite competent in this area.

One serious clue to his cluelessness is the way he states on multiple occasions that the output of a neon sign transformer is OU in and of itself. This is CRAP and not true. The output voltage on the transformer uses peak to peak voltage not RMS. Peak to peak is important because we are interested in the breakdown voltage of the gas to be ionized (neon in this case) and if this measurement is used it will give incorrect output power measurements. If the voltage is converted to RMS, the power calculations come in well under unity. This is simple stuff, but he made this same mistake, calling this device OU over and over...If he cannot understand one simple, and incredibly important component of his systems, how do we expect him to understand power measurement in general.

Aside from this, on a phone conversation I had with Peter Lindemann once, the good Dr. informed me that to his knowledge nobody had ever successfully replicated any of his devices, and he runs in a crowd with very competent engineers who have tried Im sure.


As for my device. This style with the center placed primary is called a Kinkade coil. Tesla was also a pioneer in this style coil. Ungrounded the center placed primary will excite the lowest possible harmonic at half wave, rather than the quarter wave of the "Tesla coil" or quarter wave resonator. this creates a magnetic central peak, and electric peaks at each end of the coil.

The bifilar is chosen solely for its electrostatic purposes. The bifilar winding does nothing concerning canceling any flux, and is chosen only for its electrostatic component. It is designed around right hand rule circuitry concepts and was made to take an oscillating B field, and transduce it into two virtual electrical poles. Also this has no center tap. It is only a bifilar secondary with open ends, primary and signal generator, and a wire with foil and a diode inside.

Another large misconception in this are is the idea of reverse wound coils in a transformer configuration, some people claim flux canceling, which is crazy, and untrue. When an inductor creates a B field, the magnetic dipole created is shared between both conductors. If you reverse the windings of the secondary, it still shares the same dipole, still gets its energy in the same fashion, and its CEMF created will still oppose the primary no matter what orientation it has (reverse or regular), the only difference will be the polarity found on the output wires.

[Nabo00o]

Yes I am aware that there will still be bemf in reverse winding, as the polarity will only change.
With a center tap this can be used to make the middle ground or the negative part, and it has (as you also mentioned) a drastic effect on the type of wave we would otherwise get.

I have myself been thinking that there is a lot of self-contradictions in Don's papers, but I wonder if it is a way for him of speaking, which could send a message through to the builders without getting into financial or other forms of problems. Of course he is dead now, but (at least as he himself said) the reason for the proprietary stuff was because he wanted to raise enough capital to get it out.

I personally have no belief in that such a plan could ever work, as the two systems are totally opposite.
Greed do not like free, and money, power, sponsors, capitalism etc has its only motivation from the accumulation of wealth/power. So...... anyway. I believe there might be more to magnetic fields and and what reversing the coil in relation another could do, but as I said I don't have too much experience, but I am convinced for the moment 

Julian

[kukulcangod]

Hi All

Is anybody replicate this experiment?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jim3Q_k-K9Q&NR=1

Here I will save you the trouble of searching for the not described HV device, Don was random sometimes about this names, it is called "spark coil", also another guy I can't find on youtube replicated a tesla experiment with same device, he used to suck black ink proving some kind of force field predicted by the latter, the experimenter was in a wheel chair...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jim3Q_k-K9Q&NR=1

Hopefully I will find one of this at some point cheap enough
Best Regards

[johnnyfg]

"http://www.001-lab.com/001lab/index.php?topic=639.msg27686#msg27686"
A site in Russia, look at the page using "Google Chrome" and auto-translate it into
language of choice.

Tuning instructions are there. going to check this further.

"http://translate.google.com/"
Is useful to translate the document.