Selfrunning 3 KWatts ERR unit powering 3 x 800 Watt lamps

[powerunlimited]

@harvey,instead of saying lying,I should have said obfuscate,in the rod video
he said the rods were
made of 73,74 elements,In a post to a news group he said,he only said that
because a friend video taped the rods
and was going to  show it to friends in the US,the camcorder got stolen,that was in 1988.
He recently send an email to
hartiberlin saying that hes computer was hacked a while back and they stole the
videos of the rods
from hes computer
and posted them on youtube.So which is it stolen camcorder or hacked computer
.As to the rods
there isn't going to be any rods in the ERR,its the principle that I'm refering too.
Have you seen a working elemental rod device recently not in the distant past and if you
have does it have magnets, or has the
Doctor told you about them and said there not related.
why hasn't the doctor taken out a patent on the rods
if there not related.In the rod videos he says that the rod device puts out 18 watts,
in the japan version it puts out 300 watts,if this claim is true then your pulling massive
amounts of power out of thin air,for the rod devices size thats better than any technology on earth,
don't you find odd he didn't patent it,unless hes hiding something.Yes I do speculate a lot,
when there are few facts you have too,I find it odd the doctor came up with two separate technolgies
that seemingly pull massive amounts of power out of  thin air and are not related,
and he doesn't know the source of the energy.

Heres something the doctor posted to a newsgroup


Question

This device appears to be related to the "elemental rod generator"
that was previously marketed in Japan by the ERR Company. In a
translation of the Japanese marketing documents, the inventor is
appears to also be a Dr. Schwartz from the Noah's Ark Research
Foundation. Are these units being offered for sale today?

Answer
Yes, this is related to the Rod Generator. That video was taken in
1988 by a friend of mine who came to visit me in the Philippines. His
video cam was stolen from his bag on his way back to the US so who
ever posted that video is still a mystery. Because he was planning on
showing the video to some people in the US we decided to say that one
rod contained 73 elements and the other 74. That was only to confuse
people so that they wouldn't know how really simple the rods were. I
considered my first Rod Generator a toy that needed a lot of research
and testing.

Back in 2002 my board of directors talked me into marketing small Rod
Generators to help poor countries. We pooled our money to set up a
small manufacturing plant to build our Rod Generators. We were
planning on selling them at cost to help do our part to save the world
form the Oil Companies. A week later we got a notice from the Dept. of
Energy in Japan that required the Rod Generator to be safety checked
by their laboratory before it could be sold in Japan. It took them
almost six months to test it before we received notice that it was
unsafe for public use. All the units that we had already manufactured
plus our jigs and dies had to be destroyed. That really hurt me and my
partners because we put a lot of money into that project. Since our
wife's told us not to put money into the Rod Generator we now have to
live with the old "I told you so". At least we learned a very
important lesson, I will never try to market one of my ERR generators.
When I have finished my ERR research and I fully understand how it
works, we plan on posting it on the internet. My board of directs and
myself are the ones that fund all of our Noah's Ark Research
facilities so we have no investors to account to.

Since I do a lot of lectures at different Universities we decided to
keep the big business interest and the people from the oil companies
from trying to figure out my new ERR. They like to send their people
to take close-up pictures so they can study my prototype but it won't
do them any good because we only use a small portion of the circuit
board that you see in the photos, the rest is just for show. We're
making sure that OPEC and the powerful companies don't patent my ERR
technology to keep it from the people.

[markdansie]

the plot thickens,
I see that the rod generator was knocked back in japan...but I have to wonder about other countries. It would be interesting to know why it was considered unsafe. That initself might help us gain some understanding. That might be a question you can ask oneday Harvey if you have the opportunity.
It is the ERR device we are concerned with here. That leads to another question. If it is the intent to release all the details on the internet (that is good), then why not release what is known now?
I feel having many ppeople working on it would surely increase the speed it could be developed.
I am not in anyway trying to be negative here but these are questions that I feel need to be answered. However I of course respect any inventors intention.
Mark

[forest]

Does it matter from electrons are coming if they are all free electricity ?
IMHO Kapanadze is using simply a water pipe as electron source.
The main advance (?) of presented device is to use many small circuits instead of one large.
Isn't that any two metals generating a good quantity of free electrons could work ? Simply - electrochemical battery makes very small current without depleting metals. Somehow that current is a bias for a large energy source ,effectively converting that energy into electrical one , into current.
Any ideas ?

[hartiberlin]

It would be interesting to know why it was considered unsafe.

Dr. Schwartz reported, that it was unsafe e.g. during thunderstorms,
that it could arc over and then fires could start..

Maybe with better control circuits this could be prevented.. ? Who knows...

[sigmaX]

When I see the first video, with the large white board behind, I cannot dismiss the resemblance with:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIhPayFBE9c

Or the comercial product:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bz5D5_Jzg-M

rods aside, magic is easier to produce nowadays (with easy explanations behind). I am not saying this thread is being wasted to some kind of con / joke, but then we need clear documentation to reproduce the phenomena for ourselves.

I am big enough to asess the risk involved on testing it and being responsible for any fire hazard due to a distant storm! And I live in a third world country, so no comitee will declare it unsafe and order me to destroy anything, if it works.

Regards!

SigmaX.