Pauls Device; a damn shame he regrets revealing it.

[lancaIV]

Independently affected by humans or software-automaticaly by machine there has to be an input,
a "stimulating effect" for expansion or compression,because of this action
the output effect will be ever calculated :output-input= under 1
(or under100%).
The listening of patents/publications and in comparison the trial of
commercial/market introducement shall only show what is known and
when there had been the first technical "coming out"!

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca

p.s.:I can have a C.O.P. of 10 ,the efficiency will be under 100%;
? ? ? I can have a C.O.P. of 1 Billion,the efficiency will be under 100 %;
? ? ? Technical the reach of C.O.P. 1 Billion is workable(cascade-configuration),
? ? ? this means a gain of (100000000000%-100%) is real,
? ? ? but mathematically we will ever stay in the output(=1)-input(=X)=under 1
? ? ? Neither Gallilei nor the Pope could change this status quo,
? ? ? this was,is and will ever be "the imperial status" of maths(Arithmetik) !

[Omnibus]

the output effect will be ever calculated :output-input= under 1
(or under100%).

Not so with the SMOT. The otput/input ratio with regard to the energy we spend and obtain in SMOT is greater than 1.

[lancaIV]

Your definition is the C.O.P.,not the efficiency !!!
Sometimes physics-maths" is difficult,seems unlogical:
you have to calculate from Max(=100%=output).-Min.(=input) for efficiency
you can calculate from Min(100%=input).-Max.(=output) for C.O.P.,
ever independant of solid,liquid,gas,plasma estate
of the work-medium/object !

We can ever get "energy gain",but we can not invent "new maths"!!!
Remember an old "phrase": GOTT ZAEHLT,Pythagoras

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca

[Omnibus]

Not clear what you mean by this:

Sometimes physics-maths" is difficult,seems unlogical:
you have to calculate from Max(=100%=output).-Min.(=input) for efficiency
you can calculate from Min(100%=input).-Max.(=output) for C.O.P.,
ever independant of solid,liquid,gas,plasma estate
of the work-medium/object !

We can ever get "energy gain",but we can not invent "new maths"!!!
Remember an old "phrase": GOTT ZAEHLT,Pythagoras

SMOT is an experimental device which demonstrates periodic production of excess energy. The number which you get for the output energy is greater than the number you get for the input energy What other math?

[lancaIV]

Is internal the SMOT-system none friction ?
Friction decrease the velocity as consequence the output-force !
You have to think from the TOTAL POWER=100%
and this is the stadium before the friction losts !

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca