Pauls Device; a damn shame he regrets revealing it.

[lancaIV]

To FREDWALTER:
The question is: has a post to be topic related when there are inside controversial views about the topic object or object-related comparisons ?

The Electrocharger (Sigmaautomotive) is the only not direct overunity-related
technology,
but indirectly because of the same Inventor Peter Rust,
and all other named patents-numbers/companies are really overunity-related ,
with each of them I can construct a closed-cycle-system
Impulse-Motor-Generator-outputunit recycling as Impulse

Sincerely
            de Lanca

[Nastrand2000]

With regaurd to the SMOT... when the ball is placed at the intial position, its magnetic potential is higher. As the ball travels up the ramp, its magnetic potential lowers. If its magnetic potential were the same at all positions, the ball would not move.

[Paul-R]

The SMOT ball gains potential energy, m x g x h. It is as
simple as that, Berferd.

But it gains gravitational potential energy at the expense of magnetic potential energy.?

At the expense of "magnetic potential energy"? What on earth
is this?

There is no energy expended allowing the ball to roll back
to the start. It is a matter of careful engineering. People
(on Jlnlabs, I think) have connected two ramps together to get
extra height,? and therefore extra energy.

The engineering problems are very fiddly and the speeds and
positions of the components are crucial.

Suspend your disbelief, Berferd, unless you are scared of having
your well ordered reality upset.
Paul R.

[Omnibus]

With regaurd to the SMOT... when the ball is placed at the intial position, its magnetic potential is higher. As the ball travels up the ramp, its magnetic potential lowers. If its magnetic potential were the same at all positions, the ball would not move.

Correct.

This doesn?t go against the production of excess energy by the SMOT (read my explanation in the previous posts).

[DarkLight]

Paul uses the same principle as in SMOT, but he uses a magnet instead of steel ball. The advantige of this is that we have no unwanted magnetising like in the case with steel ball. The field here is more stable and predictable. But here remains the SMOT problem  output -  intput that appears when we close the loop. I have made schemes of the magnetic field to illustrate that.  The rotor magnet moves because of the asimetry of the magnetic field. Until we have asimetry with constat value and direction, we have a force with constant value and direction wich moves the rotor magnet and we can drain excess energy from the device. But when we try to close the loop, there where the end of spiral of stator magnets has to be connected to it's beginig the field is hard  deformed. The asymetry changes it's value and direction and the rotor magnet stops.