Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!

[sigma16]

No  need to go back to banging coils its been done for yeas now nothing good came of it. A single fet low powered driving 3 phase WYE can produce several KVARs for a few watts drive.  You don't HAVE to use magamps but if you do no need to use a fet and it makes the device immune (till lightning strikes anyway)  from power surges.

There is very secretive group of highschool kids making power by banging coils.  Probably because they did not listen to people like you.

Only copper wires required no special cocktails of silver and iron wire required.

Depends on how you look at it, but most conductors will work.

In order to create the desired circuit we need to produce NEGATIVE inductors. We all heard about negative resistors but the key here is negative inductors and because we must CANCEL out  the magnetic fields as much as possible in the circuit, there by keeping the total inductance of the circuit negative. We do this by creating VARS as this disturbs the ambient but there is no current flowing as there No in phase amps. If there is no amps there is no current flowing and no Lenze. If you bang the coils you create current and a magnetic field. Everything must be done in complete opposite.

Total BS.  Cancelling magnetic fields is BS in this case.  Has nothing at all to do with it.  VARS has nothing to do with it.  Complete opposite and you get nothing.  Lenz is avoided.  Lorentz still applies.  You really need to try some of this stuff before you pass it on.  Most people in the OU circus just want to make a buck selling books, vids, and other BS.

A bifilar coil cancels out magnetic flux but so does polyphase system as power factor is slashed.

What if it is a different type of bifilar that doesn't cancel?  Two separate wires, same direction.

BUT everything else is happening the space is now highly energized as electrostatic field its pumping longitudinal waves. The i/p power may only be watts but there is several KVARs in circulation. Now there is Kinetic Energy.

It's not a direct process.  You can't just create longitudinal waves and everything starts working because it doesn't.

As Don Smith stuff = Low power precursor (a few real watts) convert to VAR = Kinetic Energy = Device rating 50KVARS+ convert to magnetic as two converging electrostatic fields = real WATTS o/p.

Or RE = RF through RLC where OU derived from RE transformations of one energy type to another.

Don Smith's devices never worked.  Don't believe the hype.

In the case of TPU 3 phase negative inductors create rotational electrostatic stress and not magnetic to begin the process and stores a negative energy charge in a space where the relative magnetic field appears, and as a counteraction, the inductors generates an electric power with a positive energy. The free electrons from the VARS field got  kinetic energy from a space as accelerating returns the kinetic energy to the space becomes deceleration.

The negative inductances  of the negative 3 phase inductors is proportional albeit non linear to the product of the rate of change of the relative magnetic fluxes impinging on the coils and the number of turns of the coil, like that of a NORMAL inductors but in reverse.  By raising the voltage applied either side of the exciter collector coils  the total number of the relative magnetic fluxes impinging on the WYE inductors can be increased. So the TPU is a sandwich where we have rotating electrostatics (Not magnetic to begin with otherwise you need current and 100 watts of coil banging only gives you a headaches and eats the power supply) where a HV positive and negative DC charge is applied. While the atomic level dynamics drops the heat out of the device the rotational electrostatic fields create eddy current when driving a real load as now we have REAL amps flowing. Note electrostatic does not mean DC static from my standpoint but much closer related to RF where the nodes are either Zero or Max and not NULL. Null means nothing so bad use for this.

The device is vertically polarized from this charge as the ambient is polarized from earth to space.

I can;t even begin to say how wrong this rant is.  It sure as hell was not vertically polarized.  It's circular.

In kapanadze the process is actually very similar but instead of 3 phase he using single phase 50Hz as the negative inductor is a VARS tank. In fact its a tube homo-polar transformer where the PF = ZERO or VSWR infinity so its an electrostatic device to begin with not magnetic. The HT DC charge is applied between the inner and outer non magnetic tube copper will work fine. OR it can be separate layer windings.  Whatever method is chosen its important the MASS is identical between the inner and outer layers. (close as practical)

Now the conditions are SET they need moving side to side to induce a REAL current with amps and volts in phase. So the 50 Hz push pull sine wave driver modulates the HV so the action is a side to side motion of two interactive electrostatic layers. The coil becomes a NEGATIVE inductor and so the normal entropy bell ringing to loss becomes GAINS of increasing magnitude while taking up ambient atomic thermal heat energy drops the inductor through its negative. With this is mind the spark gap only requires just enough to create an arc 2kv perhaps and hardly any current.

As Tesla said "Don't underestimate the force of electrostatics" .

Kapanadze appears to use more than 50Hz and you can bet your ass he is impact exciting that large coil, and he is using a lot more than 2kv.  Probably driving an ignition coil or similar.  Don't let the spark fool you.  It is HV DC into a high impedance load.  Try it yourself.

[wattsup]

@bolt

I would like to know how to make a Negative Inductor. The word "Inductor" implies coil and the word "coil" implies both negative and positive sides. So where does the negative come in to make is specifically negative.

I have done tests in this line of thinking but not with an inductor. With rings of only 2-3 turns maximum. You take a high inductance coil, put a positive pulse source on one end, on the other end you connect one end of the ring and put the negative pulse source on the other end of the ring. This will give you a ring that gets the negative of the coil on one end and the negative of the pulse on the other end, making it fully negative. But the ring cannot have too many turns otherwise it will automatically delimit its own positive/negative sides.

[giantkiller]

password 'switching'
http://s1013.photobucket.com/albums/af259/giantkilleroverunity/?action=view&current=compositebrownpaperdrawing_enhancedcopy2.jpg#!oZZ2QQcurrentZZhttp%3A%2F%2Fs1013.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Faf259%2Fgiantkilleroverunity%2F%3Faction%3Dview%26current%3Dcompositebrownpaperdrawing_enhancedcopy1.jpg%26

http://s1013.photobucket.com/albums/af259/giantkilleroverunity/?action=view&current=compositebrownpaperdrawing_enhancedcopy2.jpg

Bolt's process equals the TPU.
Sigma's process equals Hubbard's coil.

But could the TPU be an ignition coil type setup and the sparkgap be a little neon?
The smaller TPUs would then only have 1 to 2 copies instead of 6 or 8 like Hubbard.

[NickZ]

   @ Wattsup and All:
    The John St.Clairs patent shows how to build a negative inductor.
I have not seen anybody try it, yet.  I am planning on making something similar, in my own way.  Negative resistance in the coils is what Otto calls it, if I'm not mistaken.  If I am off on it, he will probably correct me. Thats one way to get him to respond. 
   It does seams like pulsing the coils with HV should yield higher voltage back.  As even increasing the input voltage from 1.5v to 12v should yield at least ten times higher output voltage. The coils would need thicker high temperature insulated wires to handle it, so they don't melt and short out.  SM did not use thin wires, neither did the  MITTS Dome device (that could start a car).   
                                                                 NickZ

   http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=nB-dAAAAEBAJ&dq=john+quincy+st.+clair
   

[giantkiller]

@Nz,
good point.
Not too many options now.
The preclude to the STclair patent was my itty bitty coil test. Then the ratshack spool virtual magamps I made.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NB8fXByWj8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkPUVqX3cNk