Scalar Wave - Energy

[pese]

Naudin has played with this.
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/sclxmtr.htm
http://jnaudin.free.fr/spgen/index.htm

ohh my god



Naudin
the transmitter circuit  can not be used normally in this circuit-schematics.
The man has no clue to the design of electronic circuits.
Even if this device should have worked in his laboratory is under the
Displayed using semiconductor NOT possible that you can copy it,
If you are using the same semiconductor types (not just in his set used
Transistors - in all the curves correspond!)

Reason, the transistors ar to use in 5 to 10 amps (typically) but here 2, of Tip 2055 (2N3955)
must here running in "milliAMP " area
that hot work in areas that are not defined in any sheet of defined amplification factors. In addition to "permissible" limits of the semiconductor ANY Function
upon not allow at least 2 transistors .
Also some mor "bugs" are to find .
So, i seen lot of Naudins electronic schematics since years, so he must serch for HELP.
Such work , its dont look "seriosly"
Gustav Pese


Ask for help if you will try this circuit
as an "transmitter" that can emit frequencies.
(i am not shure if that are scalar (!)

[exnihiloest]

Hi all ;
What's is exactly scalar energy and wave ? How can we create that ? How can we measure ?( we can measure  a current with Volt and ampere what's the components of scalar wave and energy ? )what's the formula that can we use to calculate power , energy of scalar wave ? Thanks
Regards...

"scalar energy and wave" are bullshits from FE gurus engaged in a dead end for free energy by confusing a varying field strength with a longitudinal wave.
It is an effect of a near field (electric and/or magnetic) allowing to couple an emitter with a receiver without propagating electromagnetic wave. It works the same way a capacitor links a signal from a plate to the other one.
Even Tesla whom I consider as a great inventor missed the point by opposing to Hertz and Maxwell and to their transverse electromagnetic waves.

[fritz]

Note:  I have, personally, seen a transmission of power/data from the inside of a Faraday cage to a device outside the same.  This was after the Army techs verified the room was EM tight, so I know that it wasn't a cracked shield spring or an unknown defect.

A faraday cage must not be EM tight - and an EM tight room must not be a faraday cage.-

[exnihiloest]

exnihiloest, I must ask you these questions.

1. Do you believe that Longitudinal Waves don't exist?  (Opinion?)

I don't base anything on beliefs but on objective knowledge.
No fact or observation can confirm a longitudinal wave.
It follows that Longitudinal Waves are for me the same as the pink unicorn. I don't know if it exists or not. I'll believe in it when we will be able to observe it and measure it.

2. Is this a question of how some people have defined "Scalar" Waves?

Not a question of definition. A wave propagates. The only propagating waves we can witness for are transverse EM waves.

3. Do you consider 200 miles near field?

Of course. Near field is relative to the wave length. If the wave length is around 200 miles or more, 200 miles is near field.

4. Can you transmit major power via Electromagnetic Waves over distance?  (>90% Eff)

You can, question of coupling. The longer the wave length the longer the distance (always the near field condition). Nevertheless there are some limits when the environment perturbs the coupling (earth roundness, conductor soil with losses, parasitic coupling...).

5. Was Intel's Power transfer system faked? (It's off the market now, but documented.)

No. It's real but conventional. Physics equations work perfectly.

The "longitudinal wave" is a misinterpretation of the near field (typical Meyl's error). The near field is the electric or magnetic field around the source. It contains energy (energy density: 1/2*epsilon*E² + 1/2*B²/µ) but this energy doesn't move from its own unlike EM waves. It expands from the source with the field and returns to the source at each period. It is this fact that is confused with a "longitudinal wave".

...
Any references, info, papers, or even book titles would be appreciated, as I can tell from the way you wrote that you're solid in your conclusions, and I wish I were as solid with mine.  I try to prove what little I can with my own experimentation, but in reality, I'm just a hack. 
I can build with good information, however, and some basic proofs, to keep me grounded in reality, would always be welcomed.  I just want to eliminate confusion and prevent discouragement of research into unknown areas.

You reverse the burden of proof. I have not to prove that god or the pink unicorn doesn't exist. It is to the believers in them to show the evidence.
If I asserts that elves exist and walk every night in the woods, avoiding to be viewed by human beings, no one can prove I am wrong.

Note:  I have, personally, seen a transmission of power/data from the inside of a Faraday cage to a device outside the same.  This was after the Army techs verified the room was EM tight, so I know that it wasn't a cracked shield spring or an unknown defect.  I don't believe an EM wave could exit such a cage as that's how it was tested.  Way past basic "Tempest approved" levels.  As to WHAT the Signal/Power consisted of, I'll admit, it's still theory at this time.
(To Me, at least.  There are those that "Know" it was a longitudinal wave transmission, but I feel they are also caught in the "I Know it all" routine, as they were not there, operating the equipment, nor did they build the equipment.)  No-one really Knows all.  (I'm ignoring philosophical concepts, at this time.)

We have neither the detailed description of the system nor the protocol of the experiment nor the description of the measurement apparatus nor the measurement data and neither the Army nor other official scientific institution confirmed such observations. In science, all elements in order to be able to duplicate experiments and confirm extraordinary facts are required. A personal testimony is far from being a fact of science.

From the experiments I personally conducted (signals transmission over 100 meters using an electric near field), all was perfectly working according to the physics laws. No anomaly. No mystery.

Our goal is to search for the unknown in order to explain it and to use it for our convenience, because we know that we don't know all.
We have to identify unknown facts and anomalies not described by conventional physics. Reinterpreting what is perfectly known because it is a pleasant idea to think about myteries, falseness of science, and unconsciously we want to have fun, is psychological deviance and outside of our goal.
"We want believe" is the worst attitude.
The discouragement that you want to prevent, in fact you maintain it by letting people running in known tracks and wasting their time in trying to understand what Ampère, Maxwell, Faraday and many others have already understood and explained more than one century ago.

[sparks]

  If the speed of light through a media is the same as the speed of sound through the same media  would a longitudinal electromagnetic wave appear to be produced.  And the second question I have is how fast the current needs to flow between the electric poles in order to produce the magnetic field density change that causes the wave to travel through a vacuum.  I would think the current flow would have to be way faster than the speed of light by many many orders.  And the magnetic field at any place in space must be present to begin with if it is modified by the current flows.
What generates this background magnetic field the electromagnetic wave is messing with.