Global Warming

[innovation_station]

glad your so on the ball and no dissrespect by that ...

how about this ...  if your polution caused from burning bad fuel  gets to close to the sun ... it has a potencial to go boom ...

same kinda thing if you charge caps useing my ring designs .. caps can go boom! stephan even cracked a smile on that one .... lol

as you all just found out ...  they flew round the planet almost like raindeer .....

ist!

this needs extream study...  not just the odd glance ....

[Cap-Z-ro]

" I suppose I should at least wait for the indictments before making any rash decisions. "

When clear evidence of fraud is before my eyes, with no denials from the accused...I do not need for anyone else to come along and confirm and anoint the evidence, before I draw my conclusion.


The earth is and has been quite able to adjust to all sun and man related activity.

In case many are not aware, civilizations have risen and fallen numerous times on the planet...and somehow the earth still stands.

Now, if we can get back to the crime, criminals, corruption, and their global dominance plans.

Instead of scrounging for validation of the claims made by the fraudsters, it would be much more productive to look into the motive and the opportunists themselves.

Regards...

[PaulLowrance]

@Paul

OK, before I derailed, I was going to comment on the last graph you put up. What it looks like to me is that TSI was a significant factor in the warming ramp-up between 1870 and 1980, after which it seems to have leveled off while global temps continued to rise.

So taking it all together (warming, population, carbon, TSI) it almost looks like a sort of 'perfect storm' sort of situation, at least for the 110 years mentioned above.

This was a good call on RR2's part, in reading further, some say that TSI was left out of the original models. Although that sounds unlikely, I have to admit -I- did exactly the same thing, but then, I'm not a climatologist.

So that would leave, roughly, the last 30 years to reconcile, if we were so inclined.

Tony

ATT,

For now, the problem I'm having with accepting TSI as a *main* effect for global warming is that from 1600 to mid 1700's TSI takes a massive nosedive, but global warming does not respond.

BTW, could you clarify on one of your recent statements where it appeared as if you said both sides are siding with Big Oil?  I do not see the environmentalist (global warmest) siding with Big Oil. In fact, it's the opposite, as they are opposed to Big Oil. Could you please clarify.

Paul

[PaulLowrance]

To be kind, it would be naive to think that 'big oil' would sit back and allow a bunch of rival crooks steal their turf out from under them without trying to counter the move.

In case it gets overlooked, it wasn't 'big oil' that was exposed as criminal fraudsters in those emails.

Again, lets be clear that these are only but a few scientists whose actions are not a reflection on other scientists.

Paul

[innovation_station]

i have yet to see 1 prove my work wrong ...

just 1 ...  find me one so i can reporogram his small brain....

just like my time travel ... tests .. perfectaly suited for tests ... no one can prove it wrong ..

it is possible it is not 100 % correct ... im just 1 kid ... and there is a world of ee's and sicentists ... and they ALL SUCK ... as they have a flawed understanding of how creation operates ...

so ill keep inventing things ... as i do ... 1 day maybe they wake up ...

so what ever .. your only destroying your world ... not mine ...

think bout that ...

ist               the 5th sun .... that rocked the world ...