Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

Started by PaulLowrance, December 04, 2009, 09:13:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

I'll do that but first I'd like to check whether I'll be able to find that critical offset value for a lower frequency. I find the OU effect (or, what appears to be an OU effect) to be really sensitive to the offset value.

The main question is, of course, is this OU effect real but I think now that the output current is measured across an active resistor (by dividing that current by its resistance) we're somehow closer to an assertive answer because the inductance problem that was bothering me should be gone when measuring output current in this way.

Omnibus

@Omega_0,

The resistance of the RadioShack resistor is 0.47Ohms and not 47Ohms as I wrote earlier. Sorry about that. In fact, what I'm using is the measured value of 0.1192Ohms so that won't make any difference in the findings. Thanks for correcting this and the other error where I had the decimal point off by one place.

Omnibus

I was able to observe ostensible OU with a sine wave (skewed sine wave -- 10% duty cycle) as well. The instrument offset is -6.10 which amounts to -3.66V. The maximum is at 0.520V in square wave mode. The example here is at 80kHz. Unfortunately, I have to continue with the reduced mode in Excel 2003 because it turned out Excel 2007 cannot plot more than ~30,000 points. Anyway, here are the pics from the screen and the energy-time plot. If someone is interested I'll post the Excel data too. I should also mention that at these conditions the square and the jigsaw waves show worse OU results.

Omnibus

Now, with the above results we're getting closer to the affirmative OU claim because unlike the square-wave pulses with the steep fronts and higher order harmonics we see here much smoother traces. The inductance problems also seem to be fading away compared to the square-wave case.

exnihiloest

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=8411.0;attach=44825

This schematics is correct only in linear modes.
When a magnetic core is saturated as in Steorn motor, non linear resistances must be added in parallel with each L. The Steorn's measurement error is due to this simple fact.