Magnetic amplification and neutralization motor by Art Porter

[ramset]

Larry
all I'm saying is this Gent [Darkspeed] is on this path, studying "parts" of this effect [re gauging],
and has done a lot of research and seems willing to share.

Quote

I did it with both static magnets and magnet in a rotating disk = same result


it does not matter if the material in the wheel is magnetic or not, the effect is the same.

It cancels the flux in the metallic core producing work

If you get the " gap " correct between the metallic core and the material in the wheel ( magnetic or not ) it will work

If the material in the wheel is magnetic and you get the gap set to a neutral flux location you can get more work out than if it was not magnetic
---------------------------------

Many hands make light work.

Chet

[darkspeed]

I revised my response to ( ok almost exactly  )

When energized, in the gap between the core and the material in the rotor (if non magnetic) there is a neutral zone where a balance is reached between the opposing magnet and coil. The voltage to produce this effect can be as narrow as .25v

Too much voltage or too little voltage and the balance will not result << this is very important!

It looks like the GAP is going beyond this balance and pushing the coil/core into attraction for most of the rotation and then into balance while the metal arcs pass the core.

When the material in the rotor is magnetic there is also a balance established between the repulsion of the domain at the end of the core caused by the PM and the magnet in the rotor..

To close and there is only attraction < blotch wall is moved too far inboard in the core
Too far and there is only repulsion > blotch wall is not moved in core

The magnacoaster way of doing it is very powerful, imagine 500+lb of neo force repelling the magnet in the rotor but at the cost of energizing the coil with a lot of amps for around 315deg of a 360deg rotation.

[nightlife]

 I actually like this idea but feel some improvements are needed to get the best results.
One would be collecting the energy from the collapsing fields and reusing it to lower the input consumption.
I hate wasting poles so I must add an improvement to the design. I also don't like to waste the length or strength of attraction so for that I will add another improvement to the design.

I will not agree and or disagree with this creating overuntity until a test is performed and proper data is collected but it does look promissing if it was designed properly.

We are given the volts used but that is worthless unless the amps are provided as well. We need to know what the total wattage used is and we need the design to produce more watts then the watts used before we can claim overunity being achieved.
We are supplied with the force created but we are not supplied with how much force is needed to to create the energy used to create the added force and or the neutralization.

[Magluvin]

Here is one way to test this. Two identical coils on a soft iron core with
a magnet on. The core to the left is the output coil.

G.

I think this is a good way to test this theory without building a motor.
I have some things to try it pretty close to what is shown.
But I have a feeling that they effect may be the same as getting the mag field to go from N to S as compared to no field to more field. The N and  S cause a revesal of poles, where the amplified magnet really only goes on and off. I would see the pole reversal as more happening than just on and off.

I will give it a go and see.  It may be just an Orbo type effect.  Imagine just a coil on a core and the rotor is attracted to the core, then the coil pulses a repulsion field just as the rotor meets the coil tdc. Almost the same thing, no?

Mags
Mags

[Magluvin]

Was thinking about it. The on function of attraction from the stator magnet, simulates a pretty long on time that doesnt even have to be paid for. Lts say skip the amplify mode for a second and just engage the turn off function as needed. The powerless stator mag attracted to a rotor mag, especially the long curved magnets he used in the motor, once the mags alone attract and glide after, no power was used from initial  attraction to the point of turning on the coil to just pass the sticky spot. An electric smot flux control. Well for that very small pulse during the gate passing, we shouldnt be using much. But to also power the coils once more through each cycle, during the amplify pulse, well 1 we are using more power than just electro smot. 2 will the output be more than if the rotor was magnetically pulled and pushed in place of just power consuming gate passings like orbo with a big push half of the time.
Orbo is an electro smot, using power to pass the sticky spot.  For as many great smots out there, I could only imagine how little power it would take to keep some of them going. 

This motor is very interesting indeedy. But they all are at first.

Mags