Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[The Observer]

PhysicsProf,

Thankyou so much for your interest and decision to participate in our endeavor.
                           ---> Merry Holidays to You and Yours ! <---

1. The first thing anyone should know that contemplates Unrecognized Sources of Energy (USEs) is this.

    a. There exists a Law called the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951.
    b. Over 5,000 patents are currently being made secret from the public.
    c. The list of what can be made secret includes (current list is secret too, this represents an older list)
         - All ---> NOVEL SOURCES OF ENERGY <---
         - All Super Efficient Energy Storage Systems.
         - All Super Efficient Solar cells.
     d. The vast majority of these inventions were submitted by civilian inventors with no idea they would be ambushed at the Patent Office.
     e. It is a fair assumption that...  The Powers that Be   want us to continue paying for energy (and the taxes on that energy)

2. There may be some honest doubters of Mr. Tsueng here, but rest assured the daily negativity comes from those that get paid to do so.

     a. Personally, I think that if the summation of all a member's posts are negative attacks, they should be banned.
     b. Since you may tire of the nonconstructive posts, I advise you to largely ignore them and respond only to members that appear genuine.
     c. Mr. Tsueng doesn't know everything and can make mistakes (as anyone), but his dedication to USEs is Golden.

3. The possible USEs that I am interested in involve these interesting phenomena...

    a. Magnetic Permeability... There is an internal magnetic moment that can be utilized in Ferromagnetic Materials.
         -A coil's magnetic field is amplified by orders of magnitude by the insertion of a Ferro Material. (ie... 100, 000 times)
           * I'm sure you know this is the result of previously randomly oriented magnetic dipoles lining up with the weak field of the coil.

              To comprehend how we tap into this energy, consider a speaker that can exchange magnets.
              The more powerful the magnet, the more sound the speaker emits, yet from the same input.

     b. Resonance... The phenomenon that an object will store energy vibrationally,
                               then interact with the surrounding enviroment
                               at an amplitude of vibration consistent with the energy it is storing.

         - When an energy wave is modified to a larger amplitude (without loss of duration)... it is fair to say it has been amplified.
         - When an energy wave (without losing amplitude) is extended.. it is fair to say it has amplified.

         - Two tuning forks ringing louder AND longer than one... is a clear demonstration of sound energy being amplified.
            If you prefer the Dictionary's definiton...
            5. An Intensification and Prolongation of Sound, Especially of Musical Tone, produced by Sympathetic Vibration.

4. When you combine 3a and 3b you get a Resonating Transformer. (I am not doing Ferro Resonance, just to be clear)

    a. When an audio transformer is resonated with a 1.5 V battery, you can light up a 3 V LED on the StepDown Side with ~ 4 V pulses !
        ---> this is only at 1 frequency ... Primary is 900 ohms, Secondary is 8 ohms...<---
    b. Same set up as above but.. the Primary will burn out LEDs with ~90 V pulses.
    c. Because it only happens at 1 frequency, it fair to say that the Energy Output of a Resonating Transformer is Non-Linear.

5. A Joule Thief traditionally uses the crashing magnetic field in a blocking oscillator to create a large voltage pulse.
    a. The Higher the Magnetic Permeability of the Core, the Higher the Internal Mag Field (that crashes), the More Impressive the Output (see 3a)
    b. Extraordinary Feats like lighting a 13 W CFL light bulb for the better part of a day with a SINGLE 1.5 V battery can be done.
        - There are 3 ways to do this that I have seen.
           (1) Use a large High Perm Core (torroid) with lots of turns.
           (2) Use a modified Camera Flash Circuit. .
           (3) Use the output of an Average Joule Thief to Resonate an Auto Ignition Coil. (my favorite !)

6. I believe the setup LT is going to send you does utilize a Resonating Circuit , however I don't think the core is physically resonating.
   
Again, many thanks for your time.
The Genuine Members of this Forum are Very Appreciative.

Best Regards,
                     The Observer

[XS-NRG]

CLOWNS UNITE

[PhysicsProfessor]

I have read all the comments since my post -- thank you.  Call me a clown if you wish, but perhaps a talented one given my publication and teaching history.

Excellent comments, Observer.  My background is that of an experimental physicist, rather than a theorist.  I approach this project seeking experimental verification and to learn what controllable parameters increase the COP -- along with 100% reproducibility (that is a must).

Complete theoretical understanding can come later, even after publication... at least for me.  I have worked with many theorists through the years.  Once an effect is 100% repeatable and can be scaled up, it can generally be understood in months, sometimes years.  High-temp superconductivity is an example of a novel (wonderful) effect that is taking a long time to fully understand -- despite hundreds of publications.

That's quite commendable to have colleagues interested in the area of OU. It's such a rarity that is almost unbelievable to have an academic show interest in it. Furthermore, the intention to publish the results in the peer-reviewed literature is exactly the way to go. I'd like ro ask you, however, a few questions in this regard. First, how do you at all expect results, even if most founded and rigorous, to be published in journals such as Nature and/or PRL when these and other maintream journals will return any text implying violation of COE without even sending it to referees? On the other hand, I'd be curious to know your opinion as to the use for publishing negative results. Negative results are trivial, they are expected by the mainstream and won't be a contribution to science at all. So, why bother?

Once an effect is 100% repeatable and can be scaled up, it can generally be published.  It is true that the top journals may not touch it if certain political interests are opposed -IMO ...  UNLESS the novel effect is being reproduced all over the world, which is the goal in this instance (a goal I share with Lawrence).  At that point, I believe major journals will jump at the chance to publish.

The choice of journal/venue is up to the research scientists, btw, not folks on this forum (I hope you understand).

As for the bashing, it stems from the unwillingness of the researcher to proceed along the lines accepted in science which include openness in dissemination of the research, consideration for the critics and understanding that ensuring conditions for the results to be reproduced by others is crucial for any scientific claim. Many, including the person in question, behave as tradesmen, sellers, fund raising agents and so on about something that has not even an inkling of proof, let alone that even if there were proof such behavior is unscientific and deservedly invokes derisive remarks.

Although our correspondence to date is limited, I have seen nothing from Lawrence that shows " unwillingness of the researcher to proceed along the lines accepted in science which include openness in dissemination of the research, " -- on the contrary.

Let me ask you -- is Lawrence willing to have independent tests of his prototypes?  Is he willing to have the results discussed openly?  Or is he seeking restrictions such as to make him (in an exclusive sense) lots of money?

[Groundloop]

@PhysicsProfessor,

Can you provide a web link to one of your peer-reviewed publications?

Thanks,
Groundloop.

[Omnibus]

Let me ask you -- is Lawrence willing to have independent tests of his prototypes?  Is he willing to have the results discussed openly?  Or is he seeking restrictions such as to make him (in an exclusive sense) lots of money?

No, he is not. If he were, he would have openly presented, as is usual in science, all the details so others can reproduce what he claims. There are excellent researchers in this forum who can do that without the need to be defended by individuals of unknown credentials.