Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[PhysicsProfessor]

@PhysicsProfessor,

Can you provide a web link to one of your peer-reviewed publications?

Thanks,
Groundloop.

I will not disclose my name until after the results on Lawrence's prototype are made publicly available (per my agreement with Lawrence, and my suggestion BTW).  What matters is the physics, the experimental demonstration -- and 100% reproducibility -- not so much my name.

[Omnibus]

Thus, if Lawrence indeed has a self-sustaining device, the reality of such device can be confirmed at once right here in this forum, without the need to bother well-known professors with their four oscilloscopes. There are people in this forum who can replicate it within days if not hours, if the device is indeed self-sustaining.

[PhysicsProfessor]

The only thing proven conclusively so far is discontinuous production of excess energy.

Do you mean it is not 100% reproducible?  if not, what do you mean?

" While this is enough to conclude tha conservation of energy can be violated, the society will never accept such violation if it doesn't see a self-sustaining device. "

I disagree at several levels.  First, a conclusive experimental demonstration, 100% reproducible, will be accepted by society even without a theoretical explanation -- compare high-temperature superconductivity.

Second, who says that CoE is necessarily violated? could it not be a hidden or previously unidentified source of energy?

Third, I highly doubt that CoE will be violated, that is, conservation of mass-energy.  But have we missed a source of energy?  Yes, almost certainly that is the case.

Everything else, all other efforts to claim more energy out than in, no matter how well founded, are in vain. Such efforts can only satisfy the curiosity of the limited group of people discussing OU in this and other forums. Without a self-sustaining device, clearly demonstrated and made available to thousands, if not not millions, without restrictions and without concealing anything, violation of CoE will neve get across to society, despite the fact that it has already been conclusively proven.

Again, you say " it has already been conclusively proven" but have not given me an example that can be tested.  Not one.
Lawrence has been willing to present a prototype for testing, to his credit.

[Omnibus]

I will not disclose my name until after the results on Lawrence's prototype are made publicly available (per my agreement with Lawrence, and my suggestion BTW).  What matters is the physics, the experimental demonstration -- and 100% reproducibility -- not so much my name.

Indeed. Your very participation in that in your role of a "well-known professor" isn't even needed. Let Lawrence explain how to make a self-sustaining device and help others to reproduce it. That will be enough and will be the only thing which will convince anybody that Lawrence has an OU machine.

[Omnibus]

What I referred to is 100% reproducible. Violation of CoE can be and has already been demonstrated with a 100% reproducibility. I won't go into details because it is not what's being discussed here. Here we're discussing only Lawrence's claiims.

Also, it the device is tapping into an "unknown source of energy" then that device is not an OU device and is of no interest to this forum.