Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[ltseung888]

……..

Let me close by stating that I do not believe in "free energy" or the use of the term "overunity". These buzz words cause nothing but grief for those of us that endeavor for a better understanding of what is taking place in certain circumstances where there are apparent anomalous energy effects. What I do believe is that it can be possible to extract more energy out of a process than what WE put into it, ie a COP of greater than 1. This energy does not come from nowhere, and it certainly is not free. We have to build an apparatus to intercept it, and that costs money. No more so than wind energy, solar energy, or hydro energy, to name a few, yet those are now widely accepted. To tap into the wheelworks of nature is not free energy, and does not violate the laws of physics, yet so many are offended at the very concept. To each their own.

I hope this has helped, but I will not hijack this thread to discuss this further, or to answer questions about my designs. Please do not ask me to, I will not respond. Please show respect for the thread owner and thread contents, even if you may not agree with them. The lack of respect has led to the decline of many good forums.

Bob Boyce

@Bob Boyce, thank you very much for posting here.  You have added much value in a couple of posts.

I would like to emphasize that I also do not believe in “free energy” or that the Law of Conservation of Energy can be violated.  With the Lee-Tseung Lead-out or Bring-in Energy theory, energy is brought-in from the surrounding environment.  The six conclusive experiments to be done in USA in 2011 will prove that.

The new understanding I believe I have brought into this COP > 1 field are:
1.   Sound resonance is due to the vibrating tuning fork giving order to the random motion of the air molecules.  Molecular kinetic energy is brought-in to make the sound louder and lasts longer.
2.   Gravitational energy can be brought-in via the pulse-pushed pendulum.  The mathematics should that two parts of horizontal energy can lead-out one part of vertical of gravitational energy.  The two stage Milkovic pendulum is a good example.
3.   If gravitational energy can be brought-in, magnetic energy mush be able to be brought-in.  This is the famous Ms. Forever Yuen magnetic pendulum experiment.
4.   The forum member, Observer, will show the resonating transformer.  When the frequency of the pulsing source is varied to match that of the transformer, a loud sound will be heard.  The same amount of electrical energy is supplied at other frequencies but no sound will be heard.
5.   The pulsed rotating wheel.  I have the Tong Wheel.  But others such as Newman, Bedini, Liang, Wang, etc all did similar great work.  The basic theory is that the oscillating motion is preplaced by the much more efficient rotational motion.
6.   The FLEET (Forever Lead-out Electromagnetic Energy Transformer).  With a less than US$3 device, we can demonstrate that Output Power is greater than Input Power.  All universities or research organizations with two oscilloscopes can demonstrate that. The extra energy comes from the orbiting electrons that act as tinny magnets or dipoles.

We shall compare notes on the tuning techniques used and to be used.  There will be plenty of fun and learning.

God will send Angels at the right time.  Some appeared at the Birth of Christ.

[XS-NRG]

Please do not ask me to, I will not respond.

Bob Boyce

God will send Angels at the right time.  Some appeared at the Birth of Christ.

RESPECT

[The Observer]

Bob,

Thanks for the posts, we appreciate it.
Don't worry about hi-jacking this thread.
         It's been Jacked (I think you noticed)... yet we still persist.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charlie,

Thanks for your post.
That you repeated back to me this... is a step in the right direction.

also if such magnifying is possible we will see a 100,000 to 100,000,000 cop device soon (100 being unity).
by the way, how does your text book use the word 'amplify'?

Please Please consider the formula that describes the Magnetic Field Inside of a Coil.

             B = (μ0 * μr * N * i) / l    -->    B =   Î¼r * (μ0 * N * i) / l 
               - μ0, N, i and L are constants for any given coil with a constant current.
               - μr is the Magnetic Permeability of the material within the solenoid.
               - 99.0 % of all substances are ~ 1,      Ferros are  500 to 1 Million) 

It is clear that a Ferro Core Multiplies the Magnetic Field of the Coil by many, many, many, many times.
Perhaps you would be inclined to believe the National High Magnetic Field Lab at Florida State.

Here...http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/education/tutorials/magnetacademy/magnets/page4.html
          you will find the following statement.

We can improve the magnetic field power of this solenoid even more by inserting an iron alloy core in the middle.
Remember our iron atoms of earlier, and how each was a tiny little magnet?
Well, when you put the iron alloy core into a magnetic field,
all the atoms in the iron align with it and
in so doing, boost the magnet's field strength significantly <--------
yet without using more electricity!

Until a person can see
                              Randomly Oriented Atomic Sized Magnetic Dipoles
                                                                                                        turning to ALIGN with the Coil
                                                                                                                                                    Which ADDs to the Coil's Field.
                                  Mag Field = Coil + Core                                                                               you will be stumped.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LT,

You said,

1.   Sound resonance is due to the vibrating tuning fork giving order to the random motion of the air molecules. 
          Molecular kinetic energy is brought-in to make the sound louder and lasts longer.

I highly disagree... about the Air    being the reason for the extra energy      in the Tuning Fork Experiment.

1. The Energy comes from ---> What Is Resonating ! <---
2. The Air is NOT resonating, in the tuning forks, it is the Fork's Molecules that are Doing what You Claim.
3. Air will do it, But a Volume of Air Needs to be   what is Resonated (ie. an Acoustic Guitar or Helmholtz Resonator).

Please think about this... Air is the carrier of energy for the tuning forks.
                                     You can make a fork resonate with an attached Piezo buzzer... no air needed.                                   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GodSpeed,
                The Observer

[robbie47]

Since the value of L in a simple toroidal RLC oscillator is fairly well fixed for any given wind, you alter the values of C and R to adjust the range and use a fine tune potentiometer in series with R to tune within that range.

Tuning for peak output is also not difficult, if one has access to analog test equipment. Direct measurement using digital measurement equipment simply cannot be trusted, as EMI/RFI and reactance can cause huge measurement errors. Interference aside, digital equipment relies upon sample readings, and sample rates can all too often line up with peak or null readings to produce false averages. In a nutshell, it would be wise to invest in some high quality analog panel meters, and always assume that there may be EMI/RFI present. These analog meters can be found at surplus outlets all over the world. A couple of high end analog multimeters would be a wise investment as well. Digital meters should never be relied upon in EMI/RFI prone environments.

There are several averaging methods which can be employed, one of which is to use temperature rise of a resistive calibrated load. Be sure the load is resistive, as it is getting harder to find good non-inductive resistors as time goes on. Another is to rectify and filter the output heavilly, then still measure using analog meters to prevent possible induced EMI/RFI errors. Many of these sort of devices are radiant in nature. Hence, they may radiate RF, which can and will alter test readings if one is not dilligent.

One area most often overlooked is in the power source or supply. Pulsed loads can also cause measurement errors in calculating average power consumption. It is important to also properly isolate your power source from EMI/RFI to prevent induced errors or power supply instability, and to ensure that you are truly measuring average voltage and current drawn from the power source.

I cannot give you a one fits all fixed solution, as every situation will be different, and must be dealt with accordingly. I prefer to encase my large toroids in Faraday cages to eliminate EMI/RFI radiation. Since they are not the typical electromagnetic device, it's not an issue for me. However, doing this with most radiant energy devices can adversely affect performance. Most require an influx of electromagnetic energy to exhibit the apparent effect(s).

Let me close by stating that I do not believe in "free energy" or the use of the term "overunity". These buzz words cause nothing but grief for those of us that endeavor for a better understanding of what is taking place in certain circumstances where there are apparent anomolous energy effects. What I do believe is that it can be possible to extract more energy out of a process than what WE put into it, ie a COP of greater than 1. This energy does not come from nowhere, and it certainly is not free. We have to build an apparatus to intercept it, and that costs money. No more so than wind energy, solar energy, or hydro energy, to name a few, yet those are now widely accepted. To tap into the wheelworks of nature is not free energy, and does not violate the laws of physics, yet so many are offended at the very concept. To each their own.

I hope this has helped, but I will not hijack this thread to discuss this further, or to answer questions about my designs. Please do not ask me to, I will not respond. Please show respect for the thread owner and thread contents, even if you may not agree with them. The lack of respect has led to the decline of many good forums.

Bob Boyce

It's a long story, but hollow as an empty beer keg.

[Charlieb000]

i dont remember saying
"Sound resonance is due to the vibrating tuning fork giving order to the random motion of the air molecules. Molecular kinetic energy is brought-in to make the sound louder and lasts longer."

its wrong, no energy is brought in, because its the energy used to start the resonance still bouncing around in the fork. and this order given is merely pressure energy of sound.

as for the other thing, (i prefer a second source to confirm mine (and your) opinions, just for verification)

it says iron being placed into a magnetic field while the fileld is up. this sounds like what happens with the overunity motors. but in a transformer situation you cant add iron every time there is a pulse, you use whats in there and if iron is added beforehand the inductor storage capacity is large.

Charlie.