Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

Started by ltseung888, February 24, 2010, 03:55:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

SchubertReijiMaigo

QuoteThese are not  consistent statements.  How can you say you do not believe in free  energy, and at the same time promote this "energy from gravity?"

It  is known that gravity is not depleted over time.  An object of the same  mass will continue to exert the exact same gravitational pull.  So  where does your "energy from gravity" come from?  What source is being  depleted to make this energy?

You have never answered this question, though I have asked many many times.  Could you please provide an answer?                                                


Maybe he is base his theory with the TPU gravity anomaly effect, when you pump against gravity the result is absence of gravity around the device, but the "gravity reservoir" is not depleted against time (Some "legend" about UFO tell the EBE use this system). Same thing with device that pump against time (the time slowing and stopping) or with the thermal environement (temperature droop and if you load more the device become superconducting refresh at 0 K...)

In this case we can say "The law of conservation is not violated" but you tap into an unlimited reservoir (Time, Gravity, and ZPE are unlimited in nature...).

My conviction is also we pump into something, but this "reservoir" is unlimited and does not deplete over time and whatever the amount of load, unlike wind, solar, nuclear, those tecnology are conventional and even the solar deplete... ( the sun run out of fuel in 5 billions year... )

utilitarian

Quote from: SchubertReijiMaigo on December 30, 2010, 01:17:34 PM

Maybe he is base his theory with the TPU gravity anomaly effect, when you pump against gravity the result is absence of gravity around the device, but the "gravity reservoir" is not depleted against time (Some "legend" about UFO tell the EBE use this system). Same thing with device that pump against time (the time slowing and stopping) or with the thermal environement (temperature droop and if you load more the device become superconducting refresh at 0 K...)

In this case we can say "The law of conservation is not violated" but you tap into an unlimited reservoir (Time, Gravity, and ZPE are unlimited in nature...).

My conviction is also we pump into something, but this "reservoir" is unlimited and does not deplete over time and whatever the amount of load, unlike wind, solar, nuclear, those tecnology are conventional and even the solar deplete... ( the sun run out of fuel in 5 billions year... )

As soon as you start talking about an unlimited reservoir of something, you are violating the law of COE. In the universe as we know it, there is a finite amount of everything, though those amounts can be quite large. 

It is fine if you want to say that the law does not apply and is wrong and prove that up, but to insist on the law being correct while promoting an unlimited reservoir of anything just does not make sense.

XS-NRG

Quote from: The Observer on December 30, 2010, 12:53:26 PM

If you read my all my posts, and the subsequent responses... you will find that I pretty much stand alone in my assertions.
I not only hope you gentlemen have success with your test, but also perhaps that you understand what I am talking about.

GodSpeed,
                The Observer

Your posts show that you know absolutely nothing about the underlying mechanism of magnetism.

I was hoping to see some power measurements from the prof and Bob and i wonder why Lawrence didn't send one over to Stefan.

Omnibus

Quote from: utilitarian on December 30, 2010, 01:44:00 PM
As soon as you start talking about an unlimited reservoir of something, you are violating the law of COE. In the universe as we know it, there is a finite amount of everything, though those amounts can be quite large. 

It is fine if you want to say that the law does not apply and is wrong and prove that up, but to insist on the law being correct while promoting an unlimited reservoir of anything just does not make sense.

Quite the contrary. We know exactly the opposite to what you're saying we know. We know that Universe is infinite and there is indeed an infinite amount of energy in it. The problem is that a device which taps into such pre-existing energy reservoir is not an OU device. It is a conventional device working by spending already existing energy. OU device taps into no pre-existing energy reservoir.

XS-NRG