Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[ltseung888]

A new understanding of resonance from the Lead-out Energy theory

One aspect of resonance is the enormous rise in amplitude when the system is pulsed at the resonance frequency.  The pulsing amplitude may be the same a few hertz before the resonance.  The resulting amplitude gain of the system is much smaller.  It is not a linear increase.  It is an exponential increase.

An exponential increase will occur if there is lead-out A involved.  For example if the COP is 1.5, on a loopback situation, the increase will be 1.5 x 1.5 x 1.5 ….. in repeated loopbacks.  This explains the exponential increase. 

Let us examine the same situation in another way.  Assume that we supply 100 units of energy at each pulse.  If there were no lead-out energy, the energy increase will be X + 100 units in the first pulse, X +200 in the second pulse, X +300 in the third pulse.  The energy increase in the system will be linear.

However if there were lead-out energy with a COP of 1.5, (100 units will lead-out 50 units), the energy increase with loopback will be:
In the first Pulse, energy in the system  = X  + 100 units
In the second Pulse, the energy in the system = (1.5 x (X + 100)) + 100
In the third Pulse, the energy in the system = (1.5 x (1.5 x (X +100))) + 100
Let us assume X = 0, the values will still be:
First Pulse = 100 units
Second Pulse = 150+100 = 250 units
Third Pulse = (1.5x250)+100 = 475 units

The standard Physics textbooks did not consider the Lead-Out energy from pulsing and thus the exponential behavior at resonance was never clearly understood nor explained.

Our lead-out energy machines operate with loopback at close to (or even at) the resonance frequency.  We need to extract enough energy out so that the loopback energy into the system would not “burnt out” the system.  We already “burnt out” some meters and some electronic components.

Once we accept the lead-out energy theory, the task boils down to “control” of this extra energy.  One simple technique is to pulse with a periodic quiet period.  The Stan Meyer diagram calls this as “gating” or idle time.  The analogy is to push the swing a few times and stop for a few swings before pushing again.  This means we need to introduce a timer in our Pulsing Circuit.  Without the pulsing, the lead-out energy mechanism will stop.  This will prevent the “burnt out”.  We may be able to operate very close to or even at the resonance frequency with loopback.  This mechanism appears to be ignored or not understood by most OU researchers.

*** We have such an idle time ratio function in our signal generator.  We already found that a high ratio of idle time appeared to give us better performance in some situations.

[ltseung888]

Comments from Dr. Weber, a trained Physicist

A good question on Magnetism

One way is to think that the A A is a form of Lead-Out Energy (energy from the environment).  The electrons orbiting around the Long Soft iron already have energy.  However their directions are random and thus show no net magnetic force and could not do work.  These molecules or dipoles will be “aligned” by the Permanent Magnet.  Some energy will be spent to align them.  However, the resultant setup is that the aligned setup will exhibit itself as a weak magnet.  The weak magnet is capable of doing work. 

We can treat this as using some magnetic energy from the Permanent Magnet to Lead-Out the existing electron motion energy from the Long Soft iron.  The Long Soft iron will use some of the energy to “strengthen” the magnetic field of the Permanent Magnet!  The magnetic field strength at the small Soft iron is made stronger and not weaker!

In the Lead-Out Energy Theory, we can treat molecule A changes the magnetic orientation of its neighboring molecule B.  Some energy is extracted or lead-out or draw-in from molecule B.  This in turn will get molecule B to change the magnetic orientation of its neighboring molecule C.  Some energy is extracted or lead-out or draw-in from molecule C.  Such drawing in effect propagates in a three dimensional direction. 

Theoretically, we can think of the drawing-in of energy will propagate to the entire universe â€" just like a ripple on the surface of the water.  The effect diminishes quickly with distance in a three dimensional fashion and the type of material in between. 

If this concept of Lead-Out energy is correct, we can imagine at any point, we can theoretically extract the energy from the entire universe!  This fits in with the concept of zero point energy.  Some claimed that the zero point energy is extremely large.  If any point in space can draw in the electron motion of the entire universe, the energy available is definitely extremely large.

We do not need to worry about lead-out electron motion energy ever running out!  The Universe itself is not static.  It can be expanding as predicted by the Big Bang Theory.  Or parts of it may fall into Black Holes.

The above explanation is well within the framework of existing Physics.  The energy source of the many overunity devices is no longer a mystery.  It is a matter of discovering the mechanisms to lead-out such electron motion energy.  We are reasonably sure that one of such mechanisms is to pulse near the oscillating or resonance frequency of a system. 

Dr. Weber: “I found your ideas controversial and refreshing.  The first idea is that you can draw-in gravitational energy via a horizontal pull.  The draw-in energy can be 50% of the supplied horizontal energy.”

Tseung: “That is correct.  You can re-work the mathematics to confirm it.”

Dr. Weber: “I did.  That is why I find the idea refreshing.  Your idea confirms to standard, classical physics.  The only problem is that no professor nor textbook described the pulled pendulum in your fashion.”

Tseung: “Well, Mr. Lee Cheung Kin was the first one to discover that.”

Dr. Weber: “The other concept you raised in your magnetism post above is even more refreshing.   You are saying that the lead-out energy in the magnetic environment can be compared with a permanent magnet affecting a soft iron.  What I like is the scenario of
(1)   The Permanent Magnet spends some energy to align the molecules of the Long Soft Iron.
(2)   The Long Soft Iron molecules or dipoles feed back their electron motion energy to refurnish the spent energy and further strengthen the Magnetic Field of the Permanent Magnet.
(3)   The above can be verified easily by experiment.
(4)   Your comparison with the ripple is refreshing.  In the case of the ripple, energy is dissipated or propagated out.  In the Lead-Out Energy case, energy is drawn-in via the step 1 and 2 mechanism.
(5)   The theoretical drawing-in of the electron motion energy from the entire universe is extremely refreshing.  I laughed at it initially.  But on further thought, I realized that such a scenario is allowed by classical physics.  If steps 1 and 2 are correct, such a conclusion is logical.”

Tseung: “That is easy.  We shall do such an experiment and show the results on this forum and on youtube.   Some Forum Members may beat me to it in performing such an experiment.”

[ltseung888]

Help

How can we determine the resonnce frequency of a toroidal core transformer?

I would like to determine the electric or magnetic resonance frequency of the several toroidal coils I wound.

Any suggestions?

[Devil]

Tseung, it is clear that you will have a FLEET developed sooner or later.  (You might even have developed it.  You already have the Tong Wheel to demonstrate but that have not benefited the World or your Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation.)

Have you noticed that some members who helped you in this forum disappeared?  They are likely to have achieved some type of overunity configuration as well.

How many people in this World will share freely without compensation - when they know that their overunity device is worth billions in the market place?  NONE.  Especially after I knocked at their hearts!

Steven Mark showed the Video to the potential investors - NOT the actual prototype - unless the investor put in actual cash.  For an inventor, as soon as the prototype is delivered, his value diminishes.  The engineers can then take over to make products.  This is why so many overunity inventors refuse to sell one or two prototypes.  They are afraid that others will copy.

What are the safeguards that your goal of benefiting the World can be achieved?

From your theory and experiments, the Joule Thief can be modified to demonstrate overunity.  You can help Gadgetmail to win the overunity prize.  But will that help or benefit the World?  How will the World Order change?

[Paul-R]

Help
How can we determine the resonnce frequency of a toroidal core transformer?
...Any suggestions?

Put an ammeter in series with your toroid, a resistor of some sort and a signal generator.
Set the sig-gen to 0.
Wind the sig-gen up whilst watching the ammeter.
You should notice the needle go down, pause at its minimum, and as the sig-gen
is increased further, the needle will increase.

The frequency at the minimum will be the resonant frequency for that LR circuit, noting
that the figure depends on the value of your safety resistor. You will need to change
this resistor for something nearer in value to the resistance of your actual circuit, and
then repeat the performance. Have a glance at this:
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_2/chpt_6/5.html
Paul-r