Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Fibonacci, platonic solids and Vortex coils

Started by Mk1, March 09, 2010, 10:39:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

skippula

Mk1
Sir your workmanship Is amazing!
you must have the patience of a saint !

Mk1

Quote from: Magluvin on March 12, 2010, 10:13:25 PM
Hey Mk
On that last pic, it looks good and tight. I always wondered if you had another secondary inside also, if the polarity of it would be in the opposite direction of the outer secondary. By the looks of it in relation to the primaries, it seems as if it would be just as effective as the outer secondary. So I wonder if it would take anything from the outer primary if it were added, or if the secondaries could be combined to increase the power out. =]

Mags

Good question , i made one with one coil inside (the Micro ) but was care less and did it the wrong way around , so its not wound in the right direction.I should have a second look at it  , and come back with more.

There is also more loading , if it is true that the jt coil are blind to the pickup coil load in most cases , but 2 pickup coil on the same axe that is another ball game , i connected them mobius like and got better results.
After writing this i have to comment that the micro is not the best design .
But i did connect all 3 pickup coil in series and parallel series got more light.

I am still at a learning stage and having so much fun , i hope you will too.

One constant emerge , fat wire on the pickup coil are a must , i used the biggest i had , and now looking for bigger.

I still have so much info , i will be busy this weekend making videos of most important coil i have and try to show what i mean.

Thanks Mag





Mk1

Quote from: skippula on March 12, 2010, 10:52:19 PM
Mk1
Sir your workmanship Is amazing!
you must have the patience of a saint !

Thanks , i have some patience and share a name with a saint but it is all about determination .
You are welcome !

Mark

Mk1

@all

I made this in hope of explaining how to design you own coil.

To get efficient more efficiency you need at least 36 turns per jt wire .

The offset 10 degree is considering a second parallel layer so they each 5 degree spacing on the orbit side . I still not sure but i have reason to think that going bellow 3 degree is causing the load to be more apparent at the transistor. 

jeanna

Mark,
In the drawing you show a perfect triangle. You begin by moving toward the tube and end away from the tube (I am referring to the red arrows.)
When the one triangle is finished you must move on to the next spot to begin the next triangle.
So, my question is...
If your start and finish point is 7 on a clock, is the next triangle going to be toward 6 o'clock or 8 o'clock?

Did you try both ways?
---
Quote
The offset 10 degree is considering a second parallel layer so they each 5 degree spacing on the orbit side .
I do not understand what you are saying.

About the second layer, I am assuming the bifilar is made in alternate wires on the tube on each layer. Is that right?


Thank you,

jeanna