Bruce's Discovery, Tesla's Missing Link for his Unipolar Generator!

[Hope]

Cletus,   Vortex based math is what you use it appears.    How is your math different than Rodins?  Marco's intent is not money based it is mankind based.    He even marked the doubling sequence for us on the board but could not directly so say.  (he must be under obligations not to say it)

[cletushowell]

Hope i dont know what your missing dear
im sorry i offered you the key
i gave you my email like 6 times but it seems your intent is
pushing markos math or my buttons not shure
marko is paid by sulks dont give me this bs
its not money he specificaly states he didnt know he was working for sulk
he was drawing a check sulk asked him to clone himself
I dont know why your asking me if his math works for what you need
the differencs between mine and his is
his is wrong theres three loops
in any religion any math and his loops are not equal or three
what more do you need have you watched any of my 80 plus videos maybee start there i doubt you even understand marcos if you email me then i can do a lot more but thats not your intent so what is
ch@helpuflip.com

[the_sealab_2021]

good thing i don't mock the unipolar rotor.

the deceit game with friction is the cause of rotor waste and breakdown, worthless dust and heat creation for electron current

a pool of mercury in the sealed electrode gap of my dully polar rotor design would be better than Bruce's homopolar rotor being neglected from manufacture.

steal a copper rotor design of mine and the government will force human extinction with its abused power.

[broli]

I've been out of the loop for quite a while but lately my brain started creeping back to old habits. In particular concerning homopolar motors and generators.

First I find it strange that this thread came to such an abrupt halt especially when bruce was doing such good progress. The thread lead to only one experiment from Sprocket which in itself was quite interesting.

Now the reason why I'm reviving this thread is because lately I started thinking about the use of spiral disks (pancake coils) instead of the traditional solid disks in HPM/G's. And I have some reason to believe that when using a standard pancake coil (not bifilar) one can create a HPG that has no mechanical back torque or even a HPM that does not induce a back emf. Both of these cases can be tested very easily by checking whether the HPG setup does not operate in motor mode and that the HPM setup does not operate in generator mode when spun.

The interesting part of this reasoning is that it predicts that Sprockets setup, even though it wasn't ideal, should indeed not generate a voltage and in fact could have operated as a HPM with no induced emf. I'm not sure whether the magnet is allowed to rotate with the coil or not.

The assumption is based on the fact that the mechanical back torque that is usually present on a solid disk becomes an "harmless" electric force (ie voltage) due to the geometry of the disk. The electrons would be pulled but since there's an electric path they would move along it instead of pushing against the walls of the conductor and generating a mechanical back torque. I called it "harmless" because this new electric force does impede the main generated emf. However it only arises when current is pulled from the generator. In essence the generator becomes self regulated, the more current you pull the lower the generated emf becomes.

Of course there isn't something a 33$ ring magnet and some machining skills can't prove.

[broli]

Here's the motor concept.

The spiral disk and the solid disk are only connected at the axis. Both of the disks spin together, the magnet is stationary. There should be no induced emf as both disks generate an equal amount of voltage when spun, however the solid disk produces a torque while the spiral disk does not.