Patent announcement

[conradelektro]

I like "ocean wave generators" and there are several developments going on just now. "Wave generators" are a simple concept, but durability is a very big issue, also collecting the electric power from many units deployed over many kilometers is a challenge http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_power  .

A further technology is to use the tides and there are at least two ways of doing it:

- one builds a dam that catches the ingoing tide and then the water is let out through turbines (much like the it is done with river dams);
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tidal_power_stations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_power (many more schemes are possible)

- the best I think are marine current turbines http://www.marineturbines.com/ (much like submerged windmills, several developments are ongoing)

I neither live on a lake nor near the see nor at a river or stream, therefore "water power" was never high on my agenda. But it is very windy where I live, so I started to look into wind power (but this is an other topic).

Nevertheless, I can not refrain from posting my favorite wind power:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/solar-wind/4224763
http://www.humdingerwind.com/
(forget Humdinger, the general principle is known, only special belts or special electronics could be patented; do not worry about efficiency for a home built thing, the wind is plentiful when it blows)


When I was referring to the temperature gradient I was thinking about "up and down floaters" like the ones suggested in the discussed patent from Brian.

May be one can build a very efficient "heat pump" based on "up and down floaters"? A wheel type concept probably would be best?

Since Brian (I mean the inventor of the discussed patent) has thought very long about his machines, he would be best suited to add "temperature" to his "Gedankenexperiment" and by such bringing it back to known physics.

Sorry, for posting my junk here.

Greetings, Conrad

[brian334]

At least you know you post junk.

[tbird]

brian,

i just had a read of your patent.  from this patent (for machine#1)...

When the top part of the un-expanded machine is abruptly stopped it becomes a expanded machine (FIG. 2). The momentum of the piston-like tanks full of liquid (3a) and the nose-cone full of liquid (4) pulls the piston-like tanks full of liquid (3a) out of tanks 2a and 2c. Expanding the machine.

and (for machine#2)...

The machine free-falls from position 8 to position 9. At position 9 the gas filled tank (20) in the upper part of the machine is abruptly stopped from spinning and falling by the stop in the tank (10) and by the stops on the machine (23). The lower tank (21) filled with heavy liquid keeps spinning and falling. The lower tank (21) unscrews from the upper tank (20) expanding the machine.

i think you have not considered the difference between the liquid resistance and air resistance.  consider why boats don't have brakes like cars do.

the #3 machine just falls into the trap of not considering the extra pressure at depth.  this has to be accounted for by some means.  i couldn't get the drawings to download so not sure how it works.  just from the readings, it seems to have too many assumptions that are not real, not to mention the complexity (way too many things to go wrong).

i will give you credit for a great imagination!!  keep at it, something will come.

tom

[brian334]

I know the difference between air and water.
If you don’t look at the drawings you will not understand the machines.

[Omnibus]

i will give you credit for a great imagination!!  keep at it, something will come.

Not so. This should not be encouraged.