What is over unity?

[Omnibus]

Notice, it is exactly the presenting of "(may be useless) ideas" that requires the Aesopian language and choosing words. Science requires open and truthful presentation and then the ideas do not appear strange. Who needs funding and media coverage for useless ideas even if there is someone out there who has managed to get such for his useless ideas?

[Low-Q]

That is not true. I have demonstrated conclusively in three different ways that overunity is real.

By the way, it is also not true that in order to produce energy there must be a hidden, hitherto unknown energy source to tap into. As I have shown conclusively energy can be produced without depleting a pre-existing energy reservoir provided the machine is of an appropriate construction.

No, in my opinion you haven't. You have demonstrated three versions that you believe are OU. OU does not exist - at least not in the way you have demonstrated them.
However, you can allways refresh our memory with drawings and explanations again. I bet there are users here that haven't seen your three examples of OU - maybe a link to these post are easier.

Vidar

[Omnibus]

No, in my opinion you haven't. You have demonstrated three versions that you believe are OU. OU does not exist - at least not in the way you have demonstrated them.
However, you can allways refresh our memory with drawings and explanations again. I bet there are users here that haven't seen your three examples of OU - maybe a link to these post are easier.

Vidar

Correct, that's your opinion. However, like I said, opinions don't count.

[Low-Q]

You're right. Not even yours...

[Omnibus]

You're right. Not even yours...

Yours is an opinion. Mine is not. That's the difference.