a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Last one.  I'm running out of time here but will try and cover the relevance on this in a following post.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi guys, the relevance of that rather eccentric arrangement of magnets was to get a 'design' shape that could test multiple arrangements of magnets - and their effects.  I'ts nowhere near finished.  There's a middle tier that, unfortunately, cracked and it's preventing the three tiers from turning independently.  By which I mean that it's producing a certain amount of friction.  But nor do I see any evidence of any spin at all - which I was hoping for. 

Effectively it's a series of independently 'spinable' cups each with its own bearing - but positioned on a shared axis.  Its the first stage of a series of test apparatus - the next one being a duplicate of this so that we can position two opposing fields in parallel - as required. 

Here's the thinking.  We know that there's an enormous amount of 'empty space' inside your average atom.  I've referenced this widely - and am sure that the most of you know this, but this is the analogy.  If you picture the nucleus of your average hydrogen atom - and make it the size of an apple - in the mind's eye.  Then the electron would be orbiting that nucleus at an about 8 - 12 kilometer radius to that apple.  And the electron, in turn, would be about the size of a split pea.  Between these two structures which are the only KNOWN material in that hydrogen atom - are energy levels - but no-one knows what they comprise because they are apparently without any detectable 'charge'.  The proposal is that these energy levels may be magnetic fields that somehow hold the electron 'locked' in a fixed orbit.  Just a proposal.  It may very well be wrong.  And in any event this, too would depend on the further proposal that the magnetic fields - ALL magnetic fields - comprise a dipolar particle that is undetectable (dark) precisely because it is too small and too fast for even light to detect it. 

That's the 'thinking' behind the construct.  Now.  We all know about the Casimir effect which is the ability of material to 'bond' - on a really small scale.  This 'effect' was predicted by Casimir - a mathematician - and subsequently proven.  In effect there is a property in bonded atoms to also bond with extraneous material - provided only that their proximity is such to allow this.  Take a really small piece of metal and put it next to another really small piece - and they stick like crazy. 

What's proposed here is that this 'bonding' is enabled by really small 'fields' of these dipoles that interact with energy levels but which do not themselves belong to the atom.  They're extraneous.  And they're responsible for the 3 dimensional shapes in all bound amalgams.  In other words - something other than the atom's own 'charge' or valence condition - enables the formation of the crystalline structure in all bound amalgams.  This includes water - but in gases it's confined to molecular bonding.  Anyway - that's the thinking.

But this means that if these fields are responsible for that 'bonding' and if Dave's rig is somehow influencing these tiny little one dimensional fields - then that could be the explanation for the fact that - regardless of the material - anything within it's range of influence also seems to exhibit a marked magnetic type response to the field - regardless as to it's inherent magnetisable properties - or otherwise. 

So.  This apparatus of mine is intended to explore this question.  Right now the outer rim has a n/s,s/n opposing polarities as does the inner rim.  And you can hang any kind of material on a thread and it is very evidently able to influence whatever material you use.  I am going to do a video of this but it will not be until later on next week.

So, while this is NOT in line with Dave's experiments it's still very much on the same page.  I'm just so anxious to see if I can get some answers to the many questions that the Lambright Effect seems to beg.

Regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And just something that I urgently need to reference.  This AMAZING little rig of ours was put together by one of the most extraordinary design engineers I've ever had the good fortune to meet.  I'll see if I can show some of the work that he's done - somehow and one day.   Hopefully he may yet come on board as a member.

And Theo - in the unlikely event that you read here, many many thanks for your hard work and for the time and patience in getting this lot together. 



Regards,
Rosemary

[Jetijs]

Rosemary,
great test rig you have there. Thank you for sharing, a great idea.
Thaks,
Jetijs

[nievesoliveras]

hello

this seems to be a brushless dc motor ( like DD and CD motor )

here is a pdf :

http://www.freescale.com/files/dsp/doc/app_note/AN1961.pdf

Thank you @tagor

I browsed through the document and now I have realized that I chose a very dificult task to accomplish. Or at least it seems to be very hard.

Is there any step by step tutorial on how to run a 3 phase bldc?

Jesus