Bash Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

ashtweth_nihilisti

    * Hero Member
    * *****
    * Posts: 630
    * Open souce will free humanity
    *
          o View Profile
          o WWW
          o Email
          o Personal Message (Offline)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #453 on: Today at 10:22:53 AM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote
    * Modify messageModify
    * Remove this messageRemove
    * Split TopicSplit Topic
    *

>I reserve the right to object to secret conspiritorial efforts by Glen

One more LIE or post like that Jib, energetic forum Admin , Arron ,Glen Harvey and my self  Ashtweth will make a case yo remove you from the forums. Stefan can choose what he wants, it will effect what  a lot of people who have witnessed you spread this disinformation feel

You got removed for a reason Rose  and i dont want to hear your lies any more , and its not just me more thin 5 people can testify to your behavior   you are giving us grounds to remove you TRY ME. Post one more thing insinuating that. We need it for our public records

Ashtweth Palise

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary Ainslie

    * Moderator
    * Hero Member
    * *****
    * Posts: 653
    *
          o View Profile
          o Personal Message (Online)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #453 on: Today at 10:39:07 AM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote
    * Modify messageModify
    * Remove this messageRemove
    * Split TopicSplit Topic
    *

Quote from: ashtweth_nihilisti on Today at 10:22:53 AM

    >I reserve the right to object to secret conspiritorial efforts by Glen

    One more LIE or post like that Jib, energetic forum Admin , Arron ,Glen Harvey and my self  Ashtweth will make a case yo remove you from the forums. Stefan can choose what he wants, it will effect what  a lot of people who have witnessed you spread this disinformation feel

    You got removed for a reason Rose  and i dont want to hear your lies any more , and its not just me more thin 5 people can testify to your behavior   you are giving us grounds to remove you TRY ME. Post one more thing insinuating that. We need it for our public records

    Ashtweth Palise


Ashtweth - do your worst.  If I am to be banned - then so be it.  I realise how urgently you need to silence me.  There are indeed 5 of you who will actively attempt it.  The sad truth is that all five of you subscribe to the need to lead this OU drive when it is not yours to lead.  It is frightening.  Every member and every reader and, for that matter every citizen alive can choose to read and study the work of whoever they will.  And you are rather underestimating the support I have.  What you are trying to insinuate is that you lot have some kind of monopoly on these efforts.  I have now been advised by many members that I should simply prevent you from posting here.  I will make all such advisement available to Stefan should it be required to defend my membership.  Meanwhile - PLEASE.  Do your worst.  I will not - at this stage in my life - succumb to threats - least of all from you.  I am MORE THAN READY to fight my corner.

Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary Ainslie

    * Moderator
    * Hero Member
    * *****
    * Posts: 652
    *
          o View Profile
          o Personal Message (Online)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #450 on: Today at 08:47:15 AM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote
    * Modify messageModify
    * Remove this messageRemove
    * Split TopicSplit Topic
    *

Guys - I've woken up to another slew of nonsense.  I'll deal with each point as appropriate.

Quote from: ashtweth_nihilisti on Today at 04:28:52 AM

    Rose you can ask Stefan and other moderators of forums... if you do character abuse and do not stay on topic, then dont blame me when you get banned, EF.com already showed you this reality.

    Ash

If 'character abuse' were the criterion to getting banned then you are GUILTY AS CHARGED Ashtweth.  I believe it is YOU who insinuated publicly and ON MY THREAD that I am deluded, delusional, paranoid, mistaken, confrontational, culpable, debilitated, deranged, addled, to be ignored, to be dismissed and to be ABUSED.  If that is not character assassination then I've truly lost the plot and you are right.  I must therefore be delusional.

The thread topic is NOT about replications.  How dare you impose your preferred theme on my work.

IF indeed, character assassination is the litmus to getting banned or not - then first on that list is you.  Unless it is that this assumed POWER that you assure us you have - actually entitles only your rights to indulge in this blood bath.  The rest of us must be quiet?  While you set to and do your damndest?

I am absolutely NOT guilty of character assassination.  I deal with proven facts.  And when I state that Glen is a scoundrel I do it with this caveat.  "It is my opinion that Glen is a scoundrel"  There is no law in any land anywhere that I know of where one's opinion cannot be freely expressed - unless it's China or various autocracies in the Middle East or elsewhere.  Which may explain why it is that our members here jealously guard their rights to freedom of speech. Clearly you look to deny these my rights.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

ashtweth_nihilisti

    * Hero Member
    * *****
    * Posts: 629
    * Open souce will free humanity
    *
          o View Profile
          o WWW
          o Email
          o Personal Message (Offline)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #445 on: Today at 04:28:52 AM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote
    * Modify messageModify
    * Remove this messageRemove
    * Split TopicSplit Topic
    *

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on August 22, 2010, 08:14:33 PM

    Guys, also, while I'm on the subject.  It seems that Ashtweth has got some considerable clout with both the EF.com Admin and with OU.com.  I get the distinct impression - actually because he claimed as much - that he need only say the word and anyone that he nominates will then be banned.  Personally I find this troubling - in the extreme.  I always thought that both forums were independently owned.  It means that I will indeed need to get his approval to post and his approval on what I post.  If this is true - then I wonder if Stefan could perhaps advise us - in due course - and when he returns from holiday.  I think that if Ash is some kind of authoritative administrator or perhaps even a shareholder on both forums - then that should be more openly acknowledged by Stefan.  At least then we'll all know.

    I also get it that he feels free to advise you that I'm deluded, delusional, paranoid, troublesome, but somehow 'not ALL bad' and for that matter that there may even be some residual 'good' in me.  Not only is this in rather bad taste but I very much doubt that he's a qualified practising psychologist or psychiatrist.  Which means that his diagnosis is possibly flawed and may first require some professional support before I or anyone need get unduly alarmed.  Quite apart from the excessive bad taste of his comments and his manner of relaying them - is the added indignity that I was obliged to endure while he determined the manner in which this thread needed to be conducted and the subject to be imposed on it.  And all this under the imminent threat that I do not underestimate his power.  He also advised Stefan - on an email copied to me - that his work has DWARFED my own contributions to OU.  Here he's right.  Everyone has dwarfed my own contribution.  I have nothing to offer other than a reasonably clear insight into electric current flow.  How that is eventually used is entirely not in my expertise.  Truth is I'm expert at nothing.

    But here's the point of this post.  If he is right - and if indeed, he succeeds in getting me banned - then I have this to say in my defense.  I am concerned that you are all fully alerted to the actual history of this technology and it's multiple and changing fortunes.  It's been grossly abused.  On and off these forums.  Personally I see it as a measure of how desirable the technology is - in a kind of perverse and obscure way.  But, in the event that I do disappear again -  for those who I know follow these fortunes - then look for me on Scribd.   Here too Glen posted that I had 'plagiarised' his work.  Unhappily for Glen, they also investigated the allegation, as did our academics.  And they too decided to ignore his complaints and then reposted our paper.  It's unlikely he'll be able to intervene there again.  They've got his number - so to speak.

    I am not sure to what extent I've managed my warnings regarding Harvey and Glen but hope, that at it's least you all see some need to deal with their advances with a bit of circumspection.  But it is already evident that the most of you already realise this.   The truth here is that I am not qualified to tell you what they think or even what their intentions are.  I only know that they lied to and about me, that they're lying about this technoly.  Some of those lies I can prove.  Others - based as they are on pure allegation - I can do absolutely nothing about.

    But having said all that I think this subject can now be dropped.  I feel better for airing my views on this subject.  Unless I get another 'attack' from any of them I think this matter is entirely closed.  And apologies for this diversion.  I just felt that the 8 hour attack that I endured yesterday still needed a summation.

    Kindest regards,
    Rosemary
    http://www.scribd.com/aetherevarising


Rose you can ask Stefan and other moderators of forums... if you do character abuse and do not stay on topic, then dont blame me when you get banned, EF.com already showed you this reality.

Ash

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary Ainslie

    * Moderator
    * Hero Member
    * *****
    * Posts: 653
    *
          o View Profile
          o Personal Message (Online)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #471 on: Today at 06:18:36 PM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote
    * Modify messageModify
    * Remove this messageRemove
    * Split TopicSplit Topic
    *

Quote from: ashtweth_nihilisti on Today at 10:22:53 AM

    >I reserve the right to object to secret conspiritorial efforts by Glen

    One more LIE or post like that Jib, energetic forum Admin , Arron ,Glen Harvey and my self  Ashtweth will make a case yo remove you from the forums. Stefan can choose what he wants, it will effect what  a lot of people who have witnessed you spread this disinformation feel

    You got removed for a reason Rose  and i dont want to hear your lies any more , and its not just me more thin 5 people can testify to your behavior   you are giving us grounds to remove you TRY ME. Post one more thing insinuating that. We need it for our public records

    Ashtweth Palise


Hi all.  I'm not sure that it will serve any purpose but I'm going back to this post with specific reference to the following.

>One more LIE or post like that Jib, energetic forum Admin , Arron ,Glen Harvey and my self  Ashtweth will make a case yo remove you from the forums.

And this with specific reference to my right to defend myself in the face of an attack.

>I reserve the right to object to secret conspiritorial efforts by Glen

The implication here is that I am lying and that Glen did not message the members here.  I now have SUBSTANTIAL proof of all those messages and with everyone's permission will be forwarding these to Stefan when he returns from holiday.  The only one I no longer have was the message he sent to Chet with that 'link' to an 'adult' site owned by someone called Fuzzy Tom Cat.  It apparently featured  someone called Ainslie.  But, notwithstanding any evidence to the contrary it seems that this was a result of one of those amazing co-incidences in this strange world of ours.  Glen must have found himself in the grips of randomness - and a remarkable series of typing errors.  One would need to be a fool to believe this.  And, strangely Ash, Jibguy, Harvey et al - are entirely satisfied with Glen's denial of being the author or of sending the link.  Which says much about their intellectual abilities.  But - in all fairness - Glen did explain it as evidence that the name Fuzzy Tom Cat must be popular.  I trust he sees now that it is not.  And Ashtweth seems to think that Glen does not 'message' our members notwithstanding the evidence and their own statements to this effect.  And then - I am accused of LYING when I mention this?

I may have said this already.  But in case I haven't here it is again.  It is my opinion that Glen is a scoundrel.

So.  Moving on.  Perhaps Ashtweth can advise me where exactly it is that I 'LIED' that now requires my BANISHMENT from public forums devoted to Free Energy?

Regards,
Rosemary