FUELLESS CAR PROTOTYPE by ISMAEL MOTOR

[bolt]

@bolt . Many thanks for that detailed reply .Whilst agreeing with most of what you say , I feel there is a point you have overlooked .If you look at the figures for the Aviso test ,and for the mains test , No figure is quoted for the input voltage of the motor . Either the motor runs at about 220 volts ,or more likely a lower voltage . Also we know it is a DC motor . So we cannot connect it straight to the mains . We need a rectifier , and, more than likely a transformer . These will introduce additional losses . These losses are not large , but will skew the figures a bit .AS YOU SAY , PROBABLY HIS GREATEST ACHIEVEMENT IS GOVERNMENT RECOGNITION .

It absolutely  doesn't matter what the volts are in each component. The only thing  that matters is WATTS INPUT and WATTS OUT.  So there might be rectifier to convert to DC just after the mains grid watt meter but the losses here are not worth mentioning perhaps 1%. There is always something that can be argued but mostly its splitting hairs.

In fact the data report tells you how many volts and amps is being consumed when its plugged into a very expensive calibrated WATT meter then whatever the electronics and motor does with this who cares? The answer comes out on the wheels and the Dyno shows the output watts.

let me put it another way. Does your electric meter care if you watch TV or use the Vacuum cleaner, what about charging your cellphone that's only 5 volts? Of course not it just measures the power consumed. In Aviso tech mode the i/p is now the batteries which are measured with calibrated meter shunts. Its a 3rd party government test so we have to assume within some tolerance they know how to measure IN versus OUT.

Well the bottom line is many OU debunkers will have to admit they were wrong its another notch of history etched in the road to energy freedom but for OU veterans a COP 2.7 is not fantastic.

Kapandaze device is around a COP of 100. He sticks 50 watts in and gets 5000 watts o/p

[neptune]

@bolt . I was not disagreeing with your explanation .just trying to get my head around it .I did say that the presence or absence of a transformer and/or rectifier would have very little effect on the figures . Ultimately ,I am hoping that although this may not be the only, or even the best technology , It will at least reach the marketplace , as a result of Government recognition .Difficult though technology is , the politics is always equally difficult . This is the big problem with the Kapadnadze device . I have sent you a private message .

[TheOne]

Ismael say its better to short the coil a many time as you can, he say if you could short a million of time instead of few or one is better the more you short during a phase the better free energy you get

[peakprod]

Hi , Konehead on this site ; https://sites.google.com/site/alternativeworldenergy/shorting-coils-circuits
Shows a circuit to short a coil using 2 Mosfets. The mosfets will surely only swith on when the d lead is positive to the gate. So with ac from the coil only 1 mosfet can be on at one time. Thus never shorting the coil. Can someone plaese correct me if I am wrong. Thanks peakprod.

[markdansie]

well not a scam...just delusional
why not put it on the bench and close loop it
Mark