Two arms...

[iacob alex]

  .....or a first degree lever,in my opinion ,can be the least configuration ,of a possible gravity motor ,IF  we play :

      -two masses

      -a fixed arm

      -a variable arm (so to realize,alternately,a greater/smaller torque than the opposite/fixed arm ).

        All the best ! / Alex

[iacob alex]

.....first line design,is an attempt, so that everything can be made as simple as possible,on paper firstly,and in reality chiefly...

     As a fact of matter,the problem is reduced from "two arms" to that of a "single (variable) arm".

     All that we need, is to imagine and test,a continuous unbalance (greater torque due to gravity), on the same side of the fulcrum.

     Now,the small step remains to get the self-unbalancing...self-acting.

        All the best! / Alex

     

[iacob alex]

...or a diversity of leverages , at:
  www.nathancoppedge.com/Perpetual_Motion_RepeatingLeverage_Diagrams.html
        Al_ex

[ARMCORTEX]

That motion is from the popular science 1910 fair in chicago. Mikhail Dmitriev made 2kw devices from a wheel like that, 8 feet high with a bunch of Shifting weights pushed by a bike wheel, not difficult. Self looped.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R67eK9IYYi0

But you must input the power following this concept if you want to drive something, not just having it move around forever, even tho that is pretty cool.

here is another unrelated  video, he simply locks in the gear, what happens to a machine that  tries to synchronise to a gear at high speeds ? Not sure, needs to controlled by microcontroller the  entry drive must be good. Nevertheless, good concept.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODf49HtCNj0

Here is a variation of this concept I have in mind, more elements is always better, but you get the idea.

see this sketch .

[telecom]

Interesting,
very interesting.
Can you please elaborate more?