**UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Sure ....

http://www.energeticforum.com/94127-post522.html
When a page opened in the thread there were "many" photos that opened each time the thread was viewed by someone .... I use this service for other venues also, all about bandwidth.

IF as you're now suggesting - the actual problem is you bandwidth capabilities?  Then how did you circumvent this in the first posting prior to that deletion?  And having posted - do you then get some kind of rebate for then deleting it? All of six months later?  If you need money to get more bandwidth - perhaps you can use the balance of the money that I sent to you to enable your purchase of?- I forget what.  I know some it should have gone to Aaron but never did.  Or are you hinting that you need more money to afford that extra bandwidth?  Let me know.  I'll pay it if I can possibly afford it.  All I am anxious to secure is that the data is returned - ALL THOSE PICTURES of ALL THOSE WAVEFORMS  EXACTLY as you verbally undertook to do when you secured the use of the Tektronix TDS3054C.  That way you'll have, AT LEAST satisfied ONE undertaking.

Rosemary

[WilbyInebriated]

Sure ....

http://www.energeticforum.com/94127-post522.html
When a page opened in the thread there were "many" photos that opened each time the thread was viewed by someone .... I use this service for other venues also, all about bandwidth.

i'm talking about posts like this silly girl...

Hi ewizard,

Here are the exact schematic and parts list for the 11-26-2009 revision ..... hope this helps ....

<img src="http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/fuzzytomcat/RA_COP_11-26-09.jpg" border="0" alt="" />

<img src="http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/fuzzytomcat/RA_COP_Components_01_11-26-09.jpg" border="0" alt="" />


Regards,
Glen

quote taken from: http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5250-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-part-2-a.html#post82355
one can click on either of the two image links in my quote of your post and see that the images have been removed by the account owner @ photobucket (you, glen a lettenmaier) or click on the hyperlink above and view your post directly @ energetic church...

[WilbyInebriated]

As we all well know, extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof, and using a magnetic field as a thermal energy reservoir in a COP > 17 calculation is an extraordinary claim.

I for one await her precision proof because it is grossly lacking in all of the links she provides.

Harvey

i can't believe you would use that hopelessly flawed argument... well, actually i can believe it, you tried to use the standard model to tell me electrons were 'particles' and conveniently forgot to mention that it (the standard model) is a THEORY and furthermore it is a theory that depends upon the existence of the higgs boson, a monstrous 'particle' that somehow eludes discovery...

but back to your flawed extraordinary claim statement, what then do you have to say about the big bang theory? surely this is arguably THE MOST EXTRAORDINARY CLAIM OF ALL TIME! summed up by these 8 words... 'at first, there was nothing... then it exploded'.  tell us, oh wise jehovah, how does nothing explode? such an occurrence would 'defy gravity' and violate numerous 'laws' of physics. AND WHERE IS THE 'EXTRAORDINARY EVIDENCE' FOR SUCH AN 'EXTRAORDINARY' CLAIM? and after you reconcile that, we can move on to the 'extraordinary claim' of relativity... 
ie: c.l. poor gave unassailable refutations of the claims of eddington in 1922, '26 & '30.

it is infinitely amusing to me that your most sacred "truths" of popular science are in reality EXTRAORDINARY CLAIMS which have never required EXTRAORDINARY EVIDENCE. it would have been closer to the truth and far less flawed had you said, "UNPOPULAR claims require extraordinary evidence."

[fuzzytomcat]

IF as you're now suggesting - the actual problem is you bandwidth capabilities?  Then how did you circumvent this in the first posting prior to that deletion?  And having posted - do you then get some kind of rebate for then deleting it? All of six months later?  If you need money to get more bandwidth - perhaps you can use the balance of the money that I sent to you to enable your purchase of?- I forget what.  I know some it should have gone to Aaron but never did.  Or are you hinting that you need more money to afford that extra bandwidth?  Let me know.  I'll pay it if I can possibly afford it.  All I am anxious to secure is that the data is returned - ALL THOSE PICTURES of ALL THOSE WAVEFORMS  EXACTLY as you verbally undertook to do when you secured the use of the Tektronix TDS3054C.  That way you'll have, AT LEAST satisfied ONE undertaking.

Rosemary

I am under no obligation to do anything you request at all .... and have no intention of making another complete duplicate set of test data with the various scope settings for you, it was never a requirement by Tektronix (e-mail proof if needed) or required by any Open Source community rules or regulations, only of full device disclosure ... I have done this.

All that is required by me is the 100% complete set of photos, images and data available for anyone to download, in one place ..... I have done this, everything ever posted in the public domain.
http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater

The files available are the "ORIGINAL" downloaded Tektronix test files, each test a duplicate of the same numbers, only the time and date are different on each ...... and as you know each test with a "HAND" written key for the scope downloaded file data names, device temperature and voltage readings

EXAMPLE -
IMAGE file (Tek program) default TEK000.001, TEK000.002  to TEK000.021 ( or whatever) exists in Test Number one (1) through Test Number twenty two (22)
DATA file (Tek program)  default CSV000.001, CSV000.002  to CSV000.021 (or whatever) exists in Test Number one (1) through Test Number twenty two (22)

NOT NEGOTIABLE

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I am under no obligation to do anything you request at all .... and have no intention of making another complete duplicate set of test data with the various scope settings for you, it was never a requirement by Tektronix (e-mail proof if needed) or required by any Open Source community rules or regulations, only of full device disclosure ... I have done this.

All that is required by me is the 100% complete set of photos, images and data available for anyone to download, in one place ..... I have done this, everything ever posted in the public domain.
http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater

The files available are the "ORIGINAL" downloaded Tektronix test files, each test a duplicate of the same numbers, only the time and date are different on each ...... and as you know each test with a "HAND" written key for the scope downloaded file data names, device temperature and voltage readings

EXAMPLE -
IMAGE file (Tek program) default TEK000.001, TEK000.002  to TEK000.021 ( or whatever) exists in Test Number one (1) through Test Number twenty two (22)
DATA file (Tek program)  default CSV000.001, CSV000.002  to CSV000.021 (or whatever) exists in Test Number one (1) through Test Number twenty two (22)

NOT NEGOTIABLE

I rest my case.  You are determined to HIDE from easy public access - data that DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU.

So.  There you have it readers.  Glen poses as an promoter of Open Source and IN FACT does not support open source at all.  I'm still not sure of the agenda.  But I would strongly recommend that you treat any intervention here on this thread and in this forum with a required circumspection.  Right now he is intending - yet again - to try and HOUND ME OUT of another forum.  That's the only purpose of this thread.   

Regards,
Rosemary