New permanent magnet motor on youtube from Roobert33

[Omnibus]

@Omnibus: (Here's a quick outline of the situation at 2:29) I'll be back later for explanation.

Thanks, @LightRider. Looking forward to your explanation.

[Omnibus]

@LightRider,

So, on the ordinate you have plotted the lumens while the abscissa is time in seconds and every point indicates one measurement of lumens at that particular time, right? Does the zero time on the abscissa correspond to the zeroth second in the vid?

[nievesoliveras]

When using four magnets as driver the idea is to not use the cam.
Instead all the magnets should be at the specific height less a few milimeters that the cam raises the magnet.

That way the cam is eliminated and there is always a good magnetic field around the rotor.

I could be wrong though.

Jesus

[Omnibus]

When using four magnets as driver the idea is to not use the cam.
Instead all the magnets should be at the specific height less a few milimeters that the cam raises the magnet.

That way the cam is eliminated and there is always a good magnetic field around the rotor.

I could be wrong though.

Jesus

Every time you try to solve the sticky spot problem with adding more and more magnets you get deeper and deeper into the dead-end. Therefore, the device should be kept as simple and streamlined as possible.

[nievesoliveras]

What I think is that the sweet spot  is a few milimiters below the full height of the lifted magnet by the cam.

Finding that sweet spot and instead of four magnets that are a balanced field, use three or five magnets all at that same sweet spot height  around the rotor to create an unbalanced field and there will be two or four magnets against one always.

The rotor spinning inside the magnetic field.

And the cam eliminated.

Jesus