Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

[gravityblock]

Atmospheric pressure differential AKA lifter propulsion is interesting, yes. But that does not explain the apparent gravity altering effects of strong magnetism and extreme high voltage...

We need to first define what gravity is.  Gravity is a combination of phenomena and never an individualised force.  1.) Pressure.  As a body cannot be subject to pressure in all directions, the Earth always shielding it from this pressure on one side, the body feels a difference in the forces acting upon it and falls to the surface of the Earth.  2.) Magnetism. The attraction that the vertical component of magnetism exerts on a body is, with small variations, the same as that on any other body. Thus it is that the speed of fall in a vacuum is constant. However, this attraction is not due to mass, it is caused by the magnetism with which the whole body is endowed. 3.) Temperature.  You can prove that a magnet loses its properties on being heated. As matter is made up of stationary waves, heat has a powerful influence on them. By increasing the frequency of these waves they begin to give off light.  Smoke from a cigar is heavier than the surrounding air, yet it rises as the result of warmth. That is to say the difference in density is compensated for by the temperature of the smoke.  4.) Density.  We can see that a balloon full of hydrogen gas rises, according to the volume of the gas.  That is to say, bodies of lesser density always tend to rise, in the same way that water and oil separate, due to density. Gravity does not prevent bodies of lesser density from rising. Whereas in air, which is of low density, heavy objects fall rapidly. In water, more dense than air, they fall more slowly.  Moreover, it is well known that heat reduces the density of a body. We note that heat is a factor which affects gravity, not because it is itself an agent causing the phenomena of gravity, but because it influences magnetism and density.  Pressure also influences density, thus it affects gravity.

GB

[khanster]

Atmospheric density variations provide aerodynamic lift and birds can fly...  That is not actually a true gravity propulsion effect though 

A true gravity propulsion effect creates a free fall geodesic towards the direction of travel.

Then there are theories like this:

http://www.gettingtherefromhere.info/Community/Blog/tabid/79/EntryId/17/Discussion-of-SPESIF-Abstracts-Part-Four-Interstellar-Travel.aspx

FTL ( Faster Than Light ) Travel Using Tachyons, the GEM theory, and Causality

The space-time curvature around an object defines the mass it presents to the rest of the universe. It is predicted by the GEM theory that space-time curvature around a starship can be changed by properly configured and powerful electromagnetic fields. This will allow its inertial mass to be reduced to near zero, allowing rapid acceleration with electric thrusters. If this effect is intensified, then the inertial mass of the starship can be made imaginary and the starship will become a tachyon, moving faster than light. Tachyons are real and explain “Dark Energy” , the moving apart of the galaxies that is accelerating in time. This moving apart of the galaxies defines time-flow in the Cosmos . FTL travel using tachyons therefore, because it increases the tachyon density in the Cosmos , causes the galaxies to fly apart faster and thus causes the Cosmos to age faster. Thus, tachyonic FTL drive produces irreversible change in the Cosmos and does not violate causality.

[gravityblock]

Atmospheric density variations provide aerodynamic lift and birds can fly...  That is not actually a true gravity propulsion effect though 

A true gravity propulsion effect creates a free fall geodesic towards the direction of travel.

FTL ( Faster Than Light ) Travel Using Tachyons, the GEM theory, and Causality

The space-time curvature around an object defines the mass it presents to the rest of the universe. It is predicted by the GEM theory that space-time curvature around a starship can be changed by properly configured and powerful electromagnetic fields. This will allow its inertial mass to be reduced to near zero, allowing rapid acceleration with electric thrusters. If this effect is intensified, then the inertial mass of the starship can be made imaginary and the starship will become a tachyon, moving faster than light. Tachyons are real and explain “Dark Energy” , the moving apart of the galaxies that is accelerating in time. This moving apart of the galaxies defines time-flow in the Cosmos . FTL travel using tachyons therefore, because it increases the tachyon density in the Cosmos , causes the galaxies to fly apart faster and thus causes the Cosmos to age faster. Thus, tachyonic FTL drive produces irreversible change in the Cosmos and does not violate causality.

Your view on gravity and the universe is much different than mine.  Herschel and Newton mathematically proved the existence of our magnetic field, within which the Sun and the planets move, when they discovered that the point of equilibrium of the solar system lay at a distance from the Sun equal to three times its diameter, due to the proportion of 1 to 700 in the relative mass of the planets to that of the Sun. It is round this point of equilibrium that the Sun moves. While being attracted by this point, the earth is being repelled by the light from the Sun. It's orbit round the Sun represents the balance between these two actions of attraction and repulsion.

Now, a body in space can only be in a state of equilibrium if two contrary forces meet to support it. If there were only a force of attraction without a corresponding one of repulsion, the planet would move towards the point of attraction. If the repulsion were caused solely by centrifugal force, the planet would slowly spiral in, towards the source of attraction. Without the repulsive force of the Sun, there would, however, be no circular movement. There would be neither axial rotation nor orbital revolution. A body impelled in one direction only does not move in another direction. How could Earth move in orbit in a different direction to this repulsive force? Surely a thrust from one direction cannot give rise to another at right angles to itself?

If the magnetic centre lies between a planet and the Sun, the force of attraction is predominant and the planet is drawn in. However, if the Sun is between the planet and the centre, the force of repulsion predominates and the planet moves out, its path disturbed (this is why planets move in elliptical orbits). As the position of the Sun changes in relation to the "point zero" centre, each successive aphelion and perihelion of a planet occurs in a different position.

Nobody can equate problems without weighing all the factors which lead to their solution. Scientists forgot, when dealing with the movement of planets, that energy must have been used up as a result of solar attraction working against the two centrifugal forces mentioned.  If no explanation was given as to the source of power necessary to sustain the movement, then it is because the problem was based on false premises. In the theory which I contend is the correct one, this force is derived from difference of energy potential which sunlight sets up by illuminating one face of the planet while leaving the other in darkness. A body which is balanced between two opposing forces (attraction and repulsion) has no weight and moves like a stone whirled round on the end of a string, the radius of its orbit being represented by the string.

There is an internal pressure which causes the nebulae to move away from one another.  You may raise the objection that this pressure is also applied in the direction of flight so that the internal pressure coupled with the external one would make them stable and they would not move apart, which would cause their mass to condense. My answer to this would be that energy created outside a galaxy tends to be drawn into the galaxy, condensing itself into material form. Thus we have an internal pressure coupled with an external decompression.

The flight of the nebulae prevents condensation taking place for three reasons: 1) This movement causes the interior pressure to disappear. However, nebulae appear to maintain an acceleration caused by an internal pressure within the Universe.  (2) As the nebulae move apart, that space which had been transformed into matter endeavours to return to its former state of primordial space in accordance with the law of rotation of masses in a magnetic field. This reconstitutes the energy that had been used for condensation of the matter, turning it into light, whose wave energy goes on decreasing until the moment of entropy is reached. This is what takes place on the Sun. Leaving aside the reaction that they bring about on the planets, the Sun's discharges into space are, in a sense, matter returning to its original state of primordial space.  (3) Light repels magnetic fields. Light from a myriad of suns in the various galaxies produces a very great force of repulsion on all the nebulae, and under this pressure they move away from one another. 

In the first instance God supplied the power that brings about the deformation of space and the Sun, by an opposite process, turns it back into energy, thus re-establishing the balance. That is why neither matter nor energy exist, but only deformed space, which is called matter, and what you call energy is nothing more than a phenomenon of transition between primordial space and deformed space.

GB

[BobTEW]

      My modernize idea of J.J.Thomson's  "plum pudding" electron model is the "twinkies". A golden yellow novelty cake with yellow icing on top and three nodes of cream goodness inside. The cellophane wrapper is 'Matter' ;  the cake is represention of total electromagnetic power field.  At  center of the cake is white cream sphere. Had I design this part it would been a chocolate ring. The dark power exchanger; the "Schwarzschild radius" ,Bloch wall or Roden torus it is all the same. Next is two outside spheres push-pulling double duty electron pumps. Transferring Light power thru the ring and back. Giving the magnet its dynamic charge.

[Doctor No]

The atmosphere is not for to make birds to fly. In counterpart, birds have to overcome air pressure with they own wings. They-birds have to produce enough power not only to overcome gravity but also air withstand. Please see that people can also fly. And this without wings. On the Moon f.e. Don^t trust me?;-]