Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

[gravityblock]

A quick note.

According to Frank Wilczek, mass is not conserved!

Gravock

[gravityblock]

The W and Z particles are much heavier, but the weak nuclear force is also much stronger at shorter distances.  Since it's much stronger at shorter distances, then it may be able to carry the heavier W and Z particles at the same quantum transitional velocity of 1094000 m/s.

There's also a chance the W and Z particles may have a different transitional velocity than the photons.  We won't know until the calculations are done.  Is anybody up to this task?  Maybe Rossi has the answer (If he does, then he's not telling).

Gravock

[gravityblock]

A quick note.

According to Frank Wilczek, mass is not conserved!

Gravock

At the Large Electron-Positron Collider (LEP), which operated at the CERN laboratory near Geneva through the 1990s, electrons and positrons (anti electrons) were accelerated to velocities within about one part in a hundred billionth of the speed of light. Speeding around in opposite directions, the particles smashed into each other, producing a lot of debris. A typical collision might produce ten π mesons, a proton, and an anti-proton. Now let’s compare the total masses, before and after:

electron + positron: 2 × 10^â€"28 gram
10 pions + proton + anti-proton: 6 × 10^â€"24 gram

What comes out weighs about thirty thousand times as much as what went in. If mass is not conservedâ€"and it’s not!, then we can seek its origin.

Question: If E = mc^2, then mass is proportional to energy. So if energy is conserved, doesn’t that mean that mass will be conserved, too?

Answer: The short answer is that E = mc^2 really applies only to isolated bodies at rest. It’s a pity that this equation, the equation of physics that is best known to the general public, is actually a little cheesy. In general, when you have moving bodies, or interacting bodies, energy and mass aren’t proportional. E = mc^2 simply doesn’t apply.  E = mc^2 holds for isolated bodies at rest. For moving bodies, the correct mass-energy equation is given in the image below, where v is the velocity. For a body at rest (v = 0), this becomes E = mc^2.  When a body, for example, a proton or an electron, is accelerated, v generally changes, but m stays the same. Therefore, the equation tells us, E changes.  If energy is conserved, but mass is not, then what gives?

Conservation of energy applies to systems, not to individual bodies. The total energy of a system of bodies includes contributions from both energy of motion and “potential energy” terms that reflect the interactions among the bodies. The potential energy terms are given by other formulas, which depend on the distances between the bodies, their electric charges, and perhaps other things. It is only the total energy that is conserved.

An isolated body has a constant velocity. That’s Newton’s first law of motion, which, unlike his zeroth law, still appears to be valid. When a body is isolated, we can regard it as a system unto itself. So the energy of the body should be conserved and from the formula, it is.  Conversely, when a body’s velocity changes, that very change is a signal that the body is not isolated. Some other body has to be acting on it to produce the change in velocity.  The action of one body on another generally transfers energy between them.  Only the total energy is conserved, not the energy of each body separately.

We considered a dramatic violation of conservation of mass. An electron and a positron annihilate, and out come a collection of particles whose total mass is 30,000 times larger.  Nevertheless, energy is conserved. The velocities of the initial electron and positron were very close to the speed of light. Therefore, according to the general mass-energy equation, their energy is very large, much larger than mc^2. The particles that emerge from the collision, although they are more massive, move a bit more slowly. When you add up their energies, calculated using the mass-energy equation, the sum matches the total energy of the original electron and positron. Once the particles fly out and separate, the interaction, or potential, energy becomes negligibly small.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

DrStiffler at the energeticforum has made a possible link with the Spatial Self Resonate frequency of a coil when driven single ended to the quantum transitional speed of 1.094 MHz m/s, http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3934-high-voltage-thin-air-71.html#post141994

DrStiffler's youtube channel, http://www.youtube.com/user/StifflerDr

1094000 m/s is 3.139... times the Aether's linear velocity of 348422.9 m/s. This is so very close to pi = 3.14... The Aether's linear velocity is computed by Ioannis Xydous in his publication titled, "The secret of the Electron-Positron pair v2.0". If I had a choice between reading Wilczek's paper or Xydous's paper I would definitely choose to read the publication by Xydous. In fact, IMO, Xydous's paper is a true masterpiece.

According to Xydous, there is a reduction in the E/M wave's velocity when it enters into an Electrostatic Field. This is in agreement with Wilczek's claims with photons being slowed-down inside a superconductor, and is also in agreement with Znidarsic's work when the speed of light is slowed down in the electronic structure of the atom to match the speed of mechanical waves in the nucleus. When the photon leaves the Electrostatic Field it can travel at normal constant speed equal to c in a vacuum, but with decreased momentum which corresponds to the decrement of its frequency.

Also, according to Xydous, the Cold Dark matter is nothing else than the Aether itself with linear velocity of 348422.9 m/s, which is about 861 times less than the speed of light or equal to 1000 times the sound velocity in air. Xydous also talks about 0 momentum and velocity. I hope Dr. Stiffler is listening. It wouldn't surprise me if he's familiar with Xydous's work. Xydous computes almost everything you could possibly imagine in a single paper. Mind-blowing and mind-boggling stuff.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

According to Xydous, there is a reduction in the E/M wave's velocity when it enters into an Electrostatic Field............When the photon leaves the Electrostatic Field it can travel at normal constant speed equal to c in a vacuum, but with decreased momentum which corresponds to the decrement of its frequency.

Please read the above quote, which is a quick summary of my previous post.  Reading the quick summary will help in understanding why I'm asking the following 3 questions in regards to Dr. Stiffler's SEC.  Dr. Stiffler is no longer active at the energeticforum, but is currently active at Heretical Builders.

If we had an oscillating Electrostatic field varying in strength and/or distance, wouldn't we be able to generate a broadband of frequencies?  And wouldn't all of the different frequencies generated have a different momentum which would correspond to different energy levels?  Also, doesn't this make it easier to see the relationship between velocity and frequency in regards to Znidarsic's transitional velocity of 1094000 m/s showing up as multiples of 1094000 hertz (1.094 Mhz)?

IMO, the answer to those 3 questions would be Yes, Yes, and Yes!

Gravock