The paradox of overunity

[Omnibus]

we know omni...   we get it, you're a spammer. give it a rest.

spam

[WilbyInebriated]

spam

we know guy... we get it. you're a spammer, you can stop now.

once again i, like the rest of us i'm sure, would surely enjoy seeing your designs for a "gravity machine" that doesn't use gravitational potential energy (which, as a form of energy appears by all evidences to be subject to coe).

and don't forget, you still have shown no evidence nor provided a single proof that indicates these alleged OU machines do not deplete a pre-existing energy reservoir

[exnihiloest]

@Ar-el-es,

First, om the gravity machine. please understand that gravity is not energy.
...

False. The energy density of a gravity field is D=g²/(8*pi*G).
It is the same as for the electric field (1/2*ϵ0*E²) or the magnetic field (B²/(2*µ0)).

[Omnibus]

False. The energy density of a gravity field is D=g²/(8*pi*G).
It is the same as for the electric field (1/2*ϵ0*E²) or the magnetic field (B²/(2*µ0)).

spam

[exnihiloest]

False. The energy density of a gravity field is D=g²/(8*pi*G).
It is the same as for the electric field (1/2*ϵ0*E²) or the magnetic field (B²/(2*µ0)).

spam

Your problem:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/478472/projection