Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Strategy Ruminations

Started by Omnibus, December 28, 2010, 09:35:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 ... 42
User actions

MrMag

#105
March 10, 2011, 06:49:50 PM
Quote from: Omnibus on March 10, 2011, 02:47:49 PM
It's very important to understand the nature of scientific pursuit, to not mix it up with technology and especially to not allow people who have no clue to set the tone of a scientific discussion let alone enable them to destroy the discussion. Science is about understanding nature of things. By it's very essence it is not about building practical defices to be used and marketed. This is a point that cannot be emphasized too strongly. There's nothing practical or marketable about Compton effect or Davisson-Germer's effect. Neither is Cherenkov radiation of any practical and marketable use. What is the use of Rutherford's findings or the marketability and cutting home utility bills of, say, J.J.Thompson's discoveries. None whatsoever. Uneducated people don't know these subtleties but they are aggressively infesting forums such as this and are impudently imposing their incompetence on everyone around here. That's why their inadequate behavior should be curbed and they should be put in their place. Otherwise, those genuinely interested in OU research will not only suffer from the real zealous activist enemies but also by the dictatorship of the uneducated which a nuissance but is destructive nevertheless.

Then maybe you should post this type of stuff on a scientific forum. This is a free energy forum, we like to discuss reality here. If your device is not practical, why bother us of it's trivialities.

Omnibus

#106
March 10, 2011, 06:57:16 PM
Quote from: WilbyInebriated on March 10, 2011, 05:23:01 PM
what's the use of rutherford's findings... let us see... he was the first to 'split an atom'. yeah, and omni argues there is no use for that. "None whatsoever."  you're such a visionary omni... ::)

This is an example of what I was warning everybody -- a person who has no clue allowing himself to teach who split the atom and who is a visionary thus overwhelming the forum with nonsense.

Omnibus

#107
March 10, 2011, 06:58:16 PM
Also, what I'm discussing here is reality and is not trivial.

brian334

#108
March 10, 2011, 07:03:05 PM
I don’t have a clue what you are talking about, but I would like to ask a question.
If you build this machine and make it as big as a house what is the maximum amount of energy you will get out of it?

MrMag

#109
March 10, 2011, 09:07:20 PM
Quote from: Omnibus on March 10, 2011, 06:58:16 PM
Also, what I'm discussing here is reality and is not trivial.

How can it be a reality if it's only been simulated on a computer?
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 ... 42
User actions