KMD - Kehyo's Magnetic Disruptor

[exnihiloest]

I got fascinated with the simplicity of MEG type generators
...

In the hypothesis of the linear case, i.e when the circuit parameters such as permeability or magnetic domains are not modified by fields, fields superpose, they simply add (vectorially). A variable magnetic flux can't modulate a static flux.
Therefore static permanent magnets in a magnetic circuit with coils play no role for the dynamical functioning. Only the source of a changing field is concerned.
When we remove the permanent magnets and replace them by the same matter but not magnetized, the MEG functioning is exactly the same.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motionless_electromagnetic_generator
In 2001, Bearden predicted that the first commercial products based on the MEG would be "rolling off the production lines in about one year", and as early as 2002 claimed to have a prototype of the device that produced "100 times more power out than was input"
...
As of May 2008, the MEG was still not in production, and Tom Bearden claimed he needed about $11 million to develop it to a viable commercial form.

Nobody has built a functional MEG. Every body failed with the MEG and with related devices, even Bearden. Naudin was mistaken in the measurement. Bearden's MEG is a hoax. The beauty of its simplicity is only a trap for newcomers and for those more concerned by the desire to believe than by the knowledge and the facts.

[kEhYo77]

I am positive that my device will work and the key here is the geometry. Shaping the field of a permanent magnet in this way will provide needed potential gradient at some distance at will...

[exnihiloest]

"Shaping the field" will not allow for free energy because "shaping the field" needs work/energy to modify parameters of a magnetic circuit such as permeability, magnetic domains orientation, inductance... And if you don't modify magnetic parameters then you remain in the linear case where "shaping the field" summarizes to superpose another field which adds or opposes the first one, depending on the location that is considered, and is of no help in the energy balance.

[kEhYo77]

Our mainstream scientific theories are not complete yet and sometimes they are far from the truth...
I have a background in electronics engineering and I know what I am dealing with here. Energy used for the short pulse to the Rodin coil will be recovered in the output coil around the disruptor, after the pulse because the permanent magnet wants all the magnetic domains lined up along the Closed Loop Core from North to South. In this scenario magnetic domains of the core section close to the output coil winding rotate precicely from 0 to 90 deg. back and forth, with minimal friction. It is like a pendulum swing type thing… 

[exnihiloest]

Our mainstream scientific theories are not complete yet and sometimes they are far from the truth...
I have a background in electronics engineering and I know what I am dealing with here. Energy used for the short pulse to the Rodin coil will be recovered in the output coil around the disruptor, after the pulse because the permanent magnet wants all the magnetic domains lined up along the Closed Loop Core from North to South. In this scenario magnetic domains of the core section close to the output coil winding rotate precicely from 0 to 90 deg. back and forth, with minimal friction. It is like a pendulum swing type thing…

You must consider magnetic domains as ensembles of current loops of same orientation. All elementary magnetic dipoles are current loops, even the electron spin. When you rotate the magnetic domains, you must exert a torque on the loops therefore you waste energy.

And there are also many errors of reasoning with the Rodin coils, due to the neglecting of "real life" such:
- capacity between wire turns, which is very important when signals have high frequency components
- HF radiation for the same reason
- flux leakage due to the orientation of the turns whose the cross section is not perpendicular to the toroid core
- extra flux due to the fact that the turns have also to be considered as a whole single conductor along the toroid, leaving us with a field perpendicular to the toroid plane
and so on...

So if you really think to have found the holy grail, you should build  a real setup instead of designing a pretty model. We need here engineering in electromagnetism, not in CAD software.