Would a self looping SMOT be proof of OU?

[Omnibus]

Any objections regarding my proof for OU character of smot can only be due to misunderstanding of basic physic, as is obvious in the last attempt as well. So, it's a waste of time, as has been proven time and time again, to try to refute the proof I've given.

[Omnibus]

There is a set of proofs and notions which I've developed throughout these years which already forms the OU area as a well-defined scientific discipline of its own. We need such firm basis so that we can further our efforts in a more systematic way, rather than rely on trial and error. Of course, I'm continuing to develop this discipline and perfection its logical structure and scientific basis.

[spinn_MP]

There is a set of proofs and notions which I've developed throughout these years which already forms the OU area as a well-defined scientific discipline of its own. We need such firm basis so that we can further our efforts in a more systematic way, rather than rely on trial and error. Of course, I'm continuing to develop this discipline and perfection its logical structure and scientific basis.

Oh, you sicko...
You're the one who will "develop this discipline and perfection its logical structure and scientific basis", eh?

Science is what you personally despise the most, remember?

Perfection? Logical structure? And -YOU?
ROTFL!

[Omnibus]

Moderator, moderator ... A moderator is needed to take care of an impudent spammer such as @spinn_MP.

[spinn_MP]

Oh, STFU...