Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Shorting coil gives back more power

Started by romerouk, February 18, 2011, 09:51:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

ramset

Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

popolibero

Yesterday I've run some tests with the Willis type setup, in solid state. From his patent the bigger magnet has its N facing the core it is attached to. The coil on the core when energized has the same orientation. Basically the big magnet plus coil make one magnet. The other (single)magnet with the gap opposes the core plus big magnet as it has its N oriented towards it. I've still tried all the possible orientations and could also slide the coil across the core but I never got more out than in. the output was a big cap with light bulb across it.

The orientation suggested by the patent seems to be the best, when sliding the coil towards the gap side there is a point where current draw is minimum, like a balance point, also dependent on the gap space. But with magnets on I never got close to the efficiency of the setup without magnets, which basically becomes a buck converter, or solid state bedini charger which can be up to about 85%. I tried low and higher frequencies. Also the coil got very hot with the magnets on.
Has anyone else played with this besides Romerouk?

Btw, Bolt I've dropped you a PM a while ago about the VARs, don't know if you got that.

Mario

i_ron

Quote from: giantkiller on March 14, 2011, 02:28:37 PM


Here is my version from the previous Falstad sim that I wrote.


In reality it is the circuit I posted, only with 555's

When you rework a posted circuit you give credit, as I did.

Ron

giantkiller

@Popolibero,
Tried many different magnet types. Natural and tuned resonance. Many frequencies. Square and sine. Different levels of core insertion. But I am not finished as of yet.
Otto posted this and I have a coil based on this sent to me by Moab.

You get the gauge, length, and frequency just right and it is the flux manipulation technique.

bolt

btw, Bolt I've dropped you a PM a while ago about the VARs, don't know if you got that.


Yes i did thanks and i read all your tests its looks very interesting. I still haven't had time to watch your YT vids yet as the internet for me this last weekend was very slow and take forever to load so i was going to reply after i seen them. I have been getting a LOT of PM's lately so sorry if i cant answer them all but i do read them. I prefer them in public on relevant forum so i don't have to keep answering the same questions over and over unless of course its a really private matter.