Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

Started by hartiberlin, February 20, 2011, 06:14:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosemary Ainslie

Hi Magsy.  You're right.  I need to get back to that paper.  But it's a difficult one.  Truth is I'm rather too glad to get distracted.  But.  NO MORE.  BACK TO THE GRINDSTONE.

I think we've sort of called CAT's bluff.  I don't think MaNag's paid to distract.  It's a natural talent.  Cat's another story.  Just not sure there.

Cat said 'Enough is enough
I've decided to get really tough
On a dame with a name
For an outrageous claim'.
But the tough was all blunder and bluff.

LOL.
Rosie

MrMag

Quote from: Magluvin on July 01, 2011, 12:32:54 PM
Oooo   get a clue.  I got one.  You need to get a few transistors and a FEW other parts and a heater and test it yourself..  What? No time for that, due to all this ranting?  Yeah   I got it.

Yeah  I have a clue. Hope you guys are getting paid well for all this. Thats what its really all about. Theres your clue.

As for me, I work on this stuff. I have over 80 vids on YT and that no. would increase exponentially if I had recorded every thing.

You mean MOSFET's? I don't have the expensive scope and probes required to see this alleged gigantic COP>infinity and OU. I wish I got paid to bring frauds out into the public. Really, 80 vids. So does IST, and this means what? You just don't understand. I've been playing with electronics for many years. What you may think is a interesting result that should be posted on youtube, I don't think it's that big of a deal. Most people that do not have a background or experience in electronics get pretty excited over menial things.

Quote from: Magluvin on July 01, 2011, 12:32:54 PM
Im not really going to waste any more time on your lazyness and crying cuz momma wont give you the candy. Lazy.  Build it if not.  What? Its a waste of YOUR time?
Yeh, right.  Oh  I almost forgot, your probably not going to get paid to build it.

So go have some Whaa burgers and some Frenchcries, and you can wash it down with a Whinekin.   :-*

Hey Rose. ;]

Just ignore them. They will go away. You have more important things to do.  ;]

Mags

Good bye Magluvin, rose has already apologized to me so no need for me to continue here. Anyone with any intelligence at all can see the truth and I'll leave it at that.

powercat

You really are a politician you twist everything that is said, you do anything to distract from the main point, you have more spin than a washing machine,

Can you tell me which person here has reproduced your circuit and achieved excess energy please show me their post for which ever circuit this one or the previous one, that has been shown on this forum to produce excess energy,
When logic and proportion Have fallen
Go ask Alice When she's ten feet tall

fuzzytomcat

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 01, 2011, 10:53:19 AM
WRONG AGAIN.  THERE HAVE BEEN MANY REPLICATIONS.  THE MOST SIGNIFICANT IS THE ONE THAT FUZZY TOM CAT MANAGED.  BUT HE CLAIMED that it was ACTUALLY HIS DISCOVERY  :o  NOT A REPLICATION AT ALL.

None of us EVEN CONSIDER THAT ANY VARIATION OF THIS CIRCUIT CONSTITUTES A DISCOVERY.  THEN WHEN HIS PUBLIC LOST ALL THEIR CREDIBILITY HE THEN TRIED SOMETHING NEW.  HE THEN  RAN A WHOLE LOT OF TESTS THAT WERE DESIGNED TO FAIL.  THEN HE WITHDREW THE RESULTS THAT SHOWED THAT IT WORKED.  BUT.  HE HAS STILL LEFT OUR PAPER SHOWING A FULL REPLICATION ON HIS SCRIBD FILE.  SO.  WE NONE OF US KNOW WHAT THE HELL HE IS CLAIMING.  NOR DO I CARE.  THAT CIRCUIT IS NOW SO OLD HAT THAT IT'S ALREADY OBSOLETE.  THIS NEW CIRCUIT IS WAY, WAY MORE EFFECTIVE.

Rosemary

Rosemary your a lying sack of dog do do .....

1) If I actually did a scientific replication of your DEVICE I demand you show proof of your bogus claim of your device including any and all device photos , images and data files of the replication, as you stated in many postings on many forums that you have all this in your possession and refuse to show to anyone in the open source community.

2) I have never claimed your piece of junk as a discovery of mine ..... as I stated in many posts in many forums "SHOW PROOF" of a link in a posting or anything where I claimed this .... you cheep excuse for a liar 

3) So I did testing to throw the results off .... you better have proof of this you ..... I'm sick of your lies and so is everyone else.

4) The scribid file is a optional electronic preprint that was released prior to the submitting of the paper to IEEE and is "NOT THE SAME CONTENT, TEXT OR FORMAT AS THE FIVE TIME REJECTED SUBMITTAL"


May I remind everyone ( ROSEMARY ) again ...... and again .... what is a replication !!!!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_%28scientific_method%29
Reproducibility is the ability of a experiment or study to be accurately reproduced, or replicated, by someone else working independently. It is one of the main principles of the scientific method.

The results of an experiment performed by a particular researcher or group of researchers are generally evaluated by other independent researchers who repeat the same experiment themselves, based on the original experimental description (see independent review). Then they see if their experiment gives similar results to those reported by the original group.



http://rosemaryainslie-publicblog.blogspot.com/

Magluvin

Quote from: MrMag on July 01, 2011, 01:23:30 PM
You mean MOSFET's? I don't have the expensive scope and probes required to see this alleged gigantic COP>infinity and OU. I wish I got paid to bring frauds out into the public. Really, 80 vids. So does IST, and this means what? You just don't understand. I've been playing with electronics for many years. What you may think is a interesting result that should be posted on youtube, I don't think it's that big of a deal. Most people that do not have a background or experience in electronics get pretty excited over menial things.

Good bye Magluvin, rose has already apologized to me so no need for me to continue here. Anyone with any intelligence at all can see the truth and I'll leave it at that.

An expensive scope?  I thought all you needed to see was the batteries charging while the circuit was running.
Is that not what you have been asking of Rose?

Rose apologized to you?  Where, here in her last post before my last post??? 

"I don't think MaNag's paid to distract.  It's a natural talent.  Cat's another story.  Just not sure there."

Well, ok.  I suppose ill have to accept that from you.

One down Rose.  ;]  Think you can handle the pussy's and the "not quite human yet" guy?   ;]

Mags