Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

Started by Feynman, March 22, 2011, 04:07:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mavendex

Quote from: SchubertReijiMaigo on October 25, 2011, 02:50:33 PM
Did you mean when we short secondary ? The result was a slightly PF shift to zero but not much and energy destroyer, like destructing a full of watts and output of 0 watts (short circuit) LOL a negative COP.
According to scope, it's December 2012 Armageddon before time...   :o

--> For the first time in this world, I have broken first law of Thermodynamic, I am an energy destroyer,
no maybe a Black Hole  ;D ;D ;D <--

Now the good thing will to synthesize some, because the oil Brent skyrocket now...

Like I said how many and where did you put them, Did you just short the secondary or did you fit a shorted turn to the secondary structure, did you put it on the shell or inside the shell, how many did you use 1 turn 10 turns 50 turns 100 turns?

Mav

matthewklinko

Quote from: Mavendex on October 25, 2011, 04:09:33 PM
Like I said how many and where did you put them, Did you just short the secondary or did you fit a shorted turn to the secondary structure, did you put it on the shell or inside the shell, how many did you use 1 turn 10 turns 50 turns 100 turns?

Mav

I think he meant shorting the secondary winding, I get the same results

Mavendex

Quote from: matthewklinko on October 25, 2011, 06:34:39 PM
I think he meant shorting the secondary winding, I get the same results

Don't do that add a shorted turn or several and see what happens :)

matthewklinko

Quote from: Mavendex on October 25, 2011, 06:45:19 PM
Don't do that add a shorted turn or several and see what happens :)

Hello Mav

Whats the difference between adding shorted turns, and having the shell as a shorted turn.
Wasn't that a bad thing?

Mavendex

Shorted shell = transformer not inductor
Shorted Turns = Something new and fantastic, that cold current is all I can muster up as a explanation when I do the shorted secondary turns on the secondary structure = 1. PF will not reflect 2. with enough shorted turns Amps will not reflect 3. you can watch the amps drop over time and the transformer will heat up to over 200 degrees at least in the setup I have been testing, yes heat is bad but only if you don't plan for it there are several ways to make the same concept as a superconducting transformer. 4. another side effect is you will see your voltage diminished this is why I say you will need to add more secondary to combat this side-effect.

Instead of nuclear reactions think a Magnetic Reactor still in testing stages and adding my resistive components but I can prove this beyond a shadow of a doubt that it happens.
Mav