Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[johnny874]

  @All,
When a hydraulic cylinder extends into a bellows, it changes the air pressure.
This would make it easier to lift the other bellow using vacuum.
What I dont unfrstand is how the potential that created the work is reversed. This where many good ideas fail.

   Jim

[mrwayne]

I think what you have exposed is more than what you are demonstrating.  The amount or volume of water displaced for a buoyant condition is NOT dependent on the volume of air used, that is one part of what you are showing with the corresponding piece being that a buoyant vessel within the water column losses that value when surrounded by a pocket of air.

You are on the right path, well done -
I can not reveal anymore than I have in this group, so please correspond privately - if you wish to know more
I am tired of the pettyness and distraction of some of the members here - my work goes on.
As always you may contact me through my web site.
or at mr.wayne@hydroenergyrevolution.com
God Bless you all

[mrwayne]

  @All,
When a hydraulic cylinder extends into a bellows, it changes the air pressure.
This would make it easier to lift the other bellow using vacuum.
What I dont unfrstand is how the potential that created the work is reversed. This where many good ideas fail.

   Jim

Hello Jim,
The Bellows simply act to transfer the equalization between columns, nothing new here -
Since we always have head in both columns - no vacuum
We move water not air - and we do not expand or compress the air that is no our system.
Thanks

[mrwayne]

Wayne,

I don't think that your ROI model would be revealing your business plan at all.  I find it very strange that you would state that.  Showing the ROI says practically nothing about your system.  So what if you say what the approximate cost is, what's that going to change?

You have made a good half-dozen or so statements like this that erode your credibility.

MileHigh

Milehigh,
You make it clear what you understand and don't - and you make it clear what your opinions are - God Bless them - you waste my valuable time and my energy.
Nearly everyone of your notes are character attacks and disinformation.
Happy Memorial Day, time for a hot dog and some fishing!
Good day.

[MileHigh]

Wayne:

They are not character attacks and disinformation, you are just trying to spin it that way.  Between this forum and the article on pesn dot com you are simply getting feedback from people with differing opinions.  You are promoting buoyancy as a way to get free energy and the problem is that buoyancy as a mechanism for free energy has never worked.  So the burden of proof is on you and realistically, we have no verifiable proof that you have something.

Sure, the story sounds great.  You have engaged with engineers and the people in your home town have helped you out.  It all sounds pretty cool but we have only got your words to go on.

When do you plan on offering the world definitive proof and how do you plan on going about to accomplish that?  Is there something wrong with that question?

Don't try to spin plain talk as something else.

MileHigh


PS:

This comment from you:

How many kwh can a 100kw system provide depends on the system

The answer is that it doesn't depend on the "system" and quite honestly I don't know what "system" you are referring to.  A 100 kW system can produce 100 kWh of energy in one hour, or 2400 kWh of energy in 24 hours.  There is no dependence on anything like you are trying to imply.  Your choice of words indicates that you are not familiar with the terminology relating to electrical power and energy.  If you are developing these kinds of alleged free energy systems based on buoyancy you should be familiar with all of this terminology and how to use it properly.