Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[mrwayne]

A question for you Mr Wayne.. Have you or your engineers accounted for this energy source in your calculations?

I wish I had read this earlier, I just had a meeting with the Engineers to review the Presentation they have prepared for Mark and his groups.

When we were reviewing the little 160% model 36watt model - and its design in comparison to the 10kw model which is over 800% efficient - I paused to think - if people can not grasp the 160% what are they going to do with the 800%?

So I asked them ....How does it feel to be so confident in a system that you were well educated to "know" was impossible? (as you remember I dealt with negativity all day on the forum - and to see those brilliant men in complete and utter confidence in the Physics was curious)  - they said "It feels pretty good!'

A little misunderstanding about our system - we have reduced the input cost - we do not get more out of the system than it could generate - The wrong question is "where does the energy come from" - the right question is "how did you reduce the input".

Larry has been doing an excellent Job showing how our layered system reduces the input. If you are looking for missing energy - you might not see it.

In our system - reducing the input while still producing within the capability of the system.

I know this is hard to swallow - that is why we have the big dogs working to prepare the world - as Mark explained - "it is a paradigm shift in the understanding of physics"

When Mark asked that same question last year in May - that was hard to explain - until you could wrap you head around these
Four things:
Our system is like a hydro pneumatic piston - we only supply input into the smallest diameter - yet we produce force from additive layers which continue to increase in diameter.

Second - we push down and gravity pulls down to generate an upward force - The upward force has no real weight value. (when you understand this point - you will understand why I say it is like we have a long lever we only have to move a short distance (Larry's Chart shows this today as well).

Third, the layering system increases the speed and along with point number one - increases the effectiveness of the Travis effect 11.1 times better than Archimedes' in time distance and mass.

Fourth - None of the energy used to push down is consumed - it is recycled every stroke - over and over.
So - it is design, gravity and system.

I hope this helps.

Wayne

[Ghost]

almost 100 pages of pure garbage.
so far, no solid proof to prove the workings of this machine.
all of this could of been a lot easier and direct but now it's piling up into a mountain of shit.
a simple HD video showing ALL parts inside and out of this machine in operation could of saved us tons of time.
also a video showing the machine being put together one part at a time describing each part.
and having someone replicate your "over unity machine" by some dude and sending him 2,000 dollars doesn't prove anything either.
funny because many of us have seen this kind of mountain before and wont be the last either.

good day sir!

[neptune]

@Mr Wayne. I am asking you personally to help clarify a statement you made earlier, which seems to have caused a misunderstanding between myself and others. Here is what you stated.
"I watch as some argue that using 15 cubic inches @640 PSI to generate 30 cubic inches @640 PSI in the same time frame is not overunity-or not using the right words to describe- is that we have is 15 cubic inches every stroke-3.7 times a minute."


I venture to suggest that you may have made a mistake when you wrote that. "Using 15 cubic inches to generate." Is that 15 cubic inches of water being injected into the ZED ? If it is, then it will surely not be at 640 PSI. If it is not the input to the ZED, what is it? I assume it must be the ZED input because it is the ZEDs that are OU, not the high pressure hydraulic transmission system.
    So for the sake of clarity, could you please help us here?
  Respect, neptune.

[mrwayne]

No, it doesn't help and your engineers should be ashamed of themselves for believing it. I shall leave the argument at that and await proof that you have a working system.

Well, Enjoy yourself, lol.
Opposite and equal reaction - we just use what we push one way - and then let it push back - we pay for the loss in the travel.
Wayne

[mrwayne]

This is in conflict with this:

Overunity is a clear statement and it is something else then reducing input cost.
Reducing input cost means you improve the overall efficiency of a system but this is not the same as overunity.
Overunity means you get more energy out of a system then you put in.
The correct question then is: where does the extra energy come from.
If there is extra energy it has to come from somewhere.

Your words are in conflict.

To make things clear a system is overunity or it is not.
THere is no in between.
It cannot be overunity in 7 steps, it is OU or it is NOT.

Also, talking about 10 Kilowatt systems removes every doubt i have about this system being a fake.
You clearly have no understanding of how much 10Kw actually is.
That is about 10 water boilers ! are you INSANE?
The claims you make cannot be true, if you were to look at a system like your's producing 10 Kilowatts of power it would destroy itself within seconds, and the water will boil continuously, it will be vaporized in a few minutes and your unit would explode.

Here we go again.......lol

We have no input Zero, nada, none - we use our internal operating costs to calculate our efficiency - now - you can stand on your idea that overunity must be magical energy - but ours is not that kind of Overunity.

I am sure you know that if you do not have an input - and you produce extra net - massively in our case - well that is a good thing - tough to swallow - I grant you - but has it not made you pause for just a second that ours has been reported and verified multiple times by credible people as the .1% in contrast to the 99.9% failures at Overunity?

Our system has a super efficient input cost - I have been clear on this many many times - you forgot to quote all those statements - I wonder why?.....

No I don't lol - you are just out to confuse people - I wish you used that energy to help mankind - and not try to rip them off from the Independence this machine is bringing.

Once again, ROFL.....

How could anyone ever discover anything with your limited mind....

I repeat - We do not use thermal energy - please read the patent - read the posts, get your hands wet - omg
Our Z.E.D. internal operating pressure is max 40psi, the capture method changes by output -

Our 100kw system uses a crankshaft..... our systems are quite, no emission, no fuel, independent and simple - maybe not to understand - but to build.

Why would you try to scare people?

We have talked about this all before several times?

Wayne