Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[mondrasek]

A short update on the modifications to lower the test stroke distance from the previous tests on the system presented in the earlier video.  Since the test system is built from materials "at hand" and not Engineered for adjustability, several things other than just stroke distance have changed:

Stroke now starts a bit lower, so that should mean more lift potential.  This was not intentional but just due to the nature of the "shims" that I could easily construct and the desired 8 mm stroke range that I had in mind.

The system is set up with the same methodology but probably different results now.  It has been cycled enough times that it should be able to provide useful readings in the morning.  I am allowing it an "overnight" stay to relax any new stresses since this is what I did before the previous test data was taken and so wanted to do the same this time.

But my initial impressions are this:  Wow, what a difference such seemingly small changes make!  Sorry to tease, but I am as excited to see the new data as well.  I can't guess what they will be.  I am only saying now that the system does act differently with this lower stroke range and shorter stroke arrangement.

I'll post data in the AM if nothing gets in the way.

M.

[wildew]

However, If it does not generate energy then perhaps it has use as an interesting curiosity or maybe even a piece of art, but no utility whatsoever as an overunity energy device.

Nice little twist of what was intended - and also a contradiction to the arguments of others.
"If it creates energy it has to be false because energy can't be created"
"If it DOESN'T create energy it isn't over unity and should be discarded....."

Can't have it both ways

The intent of Webby's post was - I think - to try to say that energy is not being created, it is being converted.
IF... Gravity can be considered and proved to be a flow and not a force... That is HUGE.

[LarryC]

Nice little twist of what was intended - and also a contradiction to the arguments of others.
"If it creates energy it has to be false because energy can't be created"
"If it DOESN'T create energy it isn't over unity and should be discarded....."

Can't have it both ways

The intent of Webby's post was - I think - to try to say that energy is not being created, it is being converted.
IF... Gravity can be considered and proved to be a flow and not a force... That is HUGE.

Outstanding thinking webby1 and wildew. Gravity is a flow and Wayne has shown how to tap into that flow. The new advancements, when shown, will make that fact, easier to comprehend.
Regards, Larry

[MileHigh]

If anyone here doesn't know what the Universal Law of Gravitation is they should look it up.  Gravity does not "flow" like a stream or the wind, at all.

How gravity acts is completely understandable.  It's possible to visualize exactly what the gravity field is like inside the ZED right down to the the nano differences from one 3D point relative to another.  You can do it with a calculator, a scale, and a ruler.

So any notion of "changing" gravity or "taking advantage of the 'flow'" of gravity is false.  Gravity is just "there" and it is as dead as a doornail.

[hoptoad]

snip...
IF... Gravity can be considered and proved to be a flow and not a force... That is HUGE.

Or if gravity can be considered a flowing force.? What then?

KneeDeep