Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[Red_Sunset]

......................................
ETA: there have been "thank yous" and various acknowledgements to investors and donors. I str that MrWayne's parents were among the principal donor/investors.
Financial Investors:
My Mother and Step Dad, Linda And Dwight Wasco, who initially helped to fund the patent attorney and then continued to be a resource of help and inspiration.
My uncle Al Travis – structural engineer, who grasped my vision and initial discovery and funded its research and legal fees without reservation!
My Uncle Lloyd Hooker - who worked by my side through two prototypes and helped to keep me motivated through the many set backs.
My Step Aunt and Uncle, Ed and Janet Wasco, who saw the reality and genuine gift this discovery is to the world and chose to support me and the venture!
Kevan Riley - hydraulic engineer, a friend and engineer who repeatedly had to calculate and verify my calculations on the prototypes and experiments.
Richard Larson - Electrical engineer, a friend and engineer who designed and wrote the many programs to collect our Data, and operate our system.
Kathaleen Reid-Martinez, Phd, a friend and Advisor, who helped direct and discern our direction.
Mark Dansie - Technology Skeptic, a friend and Advisor, who helped guide the applications and functionality of our system.
Checking... Yep>>
http://hydroenergyrevolution.com/index.php/special-thanks
Wait a minute.... what is Mark Dansie doing on the list of Financial Investors???

TinselKoala,
That was good spotting !
I have read this before myself, but my penny didn't drop on it. I believed it to be an acknowledgement to friends who had some part along the way to further the Zed concept, but that is the section a bit lower down.
I missed the "Financial Investors:" heading.     INTERESTING  , possibly typing position mistake ?
If it is real at this point in time, that would be a WHAMMY!!

[mrwayne]

TinselKoala,
That was good spotting !
I have read this before myself, but my penny didn't drop on it. I believed it to be an acknowledgement to friends who had some part along the way to further the Zed concept, but that is the section a bit lower down.
I missed the "Financial Investors:" heading.     INTERESTING  , possibly typing position mistake ?
If it is real at this point in time, that would be a WHAMMY!!

I have been specifically asked by Mark not to engage in this forum, due to the obvious "Jihadists against free energy".

I agreed with Mark regarding the continual manipulation of our activities, words, and circumstances ..... which continues here today.

Yet to protect the innocent: here is my response and apology.

Listing Mark under financial contributor was an error.

Thank you for the catch - and I corrected the heading to be clear - Mark has been an invaluable advisor - as described after his name as is consistent with every other persons individual type of contribution.

I have pointed out clearly and repeatedly my respect and admiration for Mark and his guidance.

It was out of respect for his counsel and advice that he was listed on the page of special contributors.

My mistake for not noticing the possible confusion until now, and my apology for any confusion I may have contributed.

Thank you for the question to bring clarity.

Added: Also - Mark is not a member of the "Final Validation team" - so do not make assumptions - Mark has arranged a completly independant and extremely qualified Validation team.

Mark is one of my friends, a good man, and wise in his actions.

Now back to work.

Wayne

[TinselKoala]

Before you go.... don't you want to explain how, if you have no input, you can be 960 percent efficient?

Since efficiency is the ratio of output to input, if you have no input but some usable output you actually have E = OUT/Zero, and that's either undefined or infinite, depending on how much math you had in school.

But if you mean that you have 9.6 times more output than input.... and you have zero input, that means your output is 9.6 times zero, and that's zero, in anyone's math.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ5-BTdcqjk

You guys had better be careful up there. If you create a black hole or something, messing around with gravity like that, I'm too close for comfort down here near Comfort, Texas.

[Red_Sunset]

Before you go.... don't you want to explain how, if you have no input, you can be 960 percent efficient?
Since efficiency is the ratio of output to input, if you have no input but some usable output you actually have E = OUT/Zero, and that's either undefined or infinite, depending on how much math you had in school.
But if you mean that you have 9.6 times more output than input.... and you have zero input, that means your output is 9.6 times zero, and that's zero, in anyone's math.

Yes, TinselKoala, That is how it would be when you want to act stupid about it.
I suggest you follow the good example of 'PowerCat'.  admirable!!    You could recall and refer to previous posts by Wayne, where he explains how he measures OU and efficiencies on the Zed system.
No..No..that is not what you want to do, you rather throw some meaningless emotional rocks around, as if you have a score to settle ? Have you..?

Not good my boy !! not good !!

Why don't you take yourself and your dog up to Oklahoma and pay Wayne a visit, this would do yourself, this forum and the whole a world a lot of good !!

[TinselKoala]

Yes, TinselKoala, That is how it would be when you want to act stupid about it.
I suggest you follow the good example of 'PowerCat'.  admirable!!    You could recall and refer to previous posts by Wayne, where he explains how he measures OU and efficiencies on the Zed system.
No..No..that is not what you want to do, you rather throw some meaningless emotional rocks around, as if you have a score to settle ? Have you..?

Not good my boy !! not good !!

Why don't you take yourself and your dog up to Oklahoma and pay Wayne a visit, this would do yourself, this forum and the whole a world a lot of good !!

Mister Wayne's "explanations" do not explain anything in any language I speak. Energy and work are measured in Joules in the Systeme Internationale, used by scientists and engineers around the world. Efficiency is the ratio of output energy to input energy, or equivalently, work. Ratios are expressed by division. That is just the way it is. And Mister Wayne has repeatedly said that there is NO INPUT.
That is NOT meaningless!!  Would you care to dispute any of those specific points?? Or are you satisfied with calling me names and slinging more mud at me?

If you are referring to Mister Wayne's calling an airconditioner overunity..... well, as long as you don't take into consideration the energy it takes to run it..... oh come on, pull the other one why don't you. This is absurd.

And are you offering me a contract? I doubt if you can afford my daily rate, and I have a penalty clause in my standard contract that says if I get there and am NOT shown what I have been offered to see, for any reason not of my doing, whether act of God or war or tsunami or parts left on the loading dock or whatever, I turn around and go home immediately, with three full days paid at my usual rate.

You get my sarcasm, humor, critical analysis based on what I read here and there, and you get to sling mud at me for free. But if you want me to travel.... you must pay, and there will be conditions.

But you don't have to pay Maggie, she works for biscuits.

But all that is moot anyway. I don't want to be anywhere near something that's ten feet tall, groans like a sick Texas Longhorn, and is 960 percent overunity.... and keeps springing leaks.