Free Energy prize money

[profitis]

How about we begin with just the fluorinated species 1st @sarkeizen: triamcinolone,fludrocortisone,fluicinolone

[Poit]

Tink, you are really a case. I can barely figure out what your posts mean, or, what your intentions are, because you are the poster child for scatter brain miscommunication syndrome.

What the Hell are you talking about "those claimants" for in connection with me? In your delusional state do you envision that all of your detractors are in a conspiracy just for the one purpose of destroying your personal hubris? Not so. I know little about you in particular and care less. I happen to have a differing opinion than you about the best way to use some superlative invention for the quickest benefit for all of humanity, STARTING WITH THOSE WHO URGENTLY NEED THE MOST HELP FIRST. 

CANGAS is not asking you or anybody to sign an NDA or anything else. In which of your deleriums did you get that?

CANGAS has not needed you to point out anything. CANGAS has already figured out what to do and who to contact (and, pretty much, who to NOT contact) when and if an inventor discovers a genuine OU Free Energy device or process.


Oh, silly Tink. How long will somebody like me continue to tolerate your type of silliness?

A genuine OU Free Energy device will possibly be so simple and easy to understand that the nexus could be applied to 20 or 30 or more devices based on purely mechanical principles. Not being an electronics guru, I cannot guess, how many variations on a theme the Tesla concepts can generate. Would it be fair to guess 20 or 30 or more?

The majority of humanity is dog-eat-dog sinful and selfish. An lucky inventor who has primarily altruistic intentions is a lamb surrounded by hungry wolves. The lucky inventor must be the watch-man who sizes up his adversary before making his move to try to make his shot. The lucky inventor must keep up with any outburst uttered by any silly tinkerer who may have had a lucky dream in which the silly imagined that if the widget was shaped just right and moved in just the right way, then it might do OU. The true lucky inventor must patiently wait and watch to see if some silly may have dreamed of something that might work and has blabbed it. The true lucky inventor cannot take the chance that some silly might trump by blabbing prior art before the right time to publish a genuine OU device.

A genuine OU device will do colossal disruption to the Energy Establishment and the financial stability of the global economy. It will get much worse before it then gets much, much, better. A righteous and conscientious true lucky inventor is duty-bound to try to time his announcement for the right time to do the least harm before it then will do the most good.

That, silly, silly Tink, is why an inventor who hopes to discover true OU Free Energy (or may have already done so) scouts out this site even if he has figured out that his best plan is to patent rather than blatantly give it away on the front end.


Happiest Regards
CANGAS 104



   

"Oh, silly Tink. How long will somebody like me continue to tolerate your type of silliness? " hopefully not long, TK is the voice of reason on this forum and people like you have no place insulting other members. Please DONT tolerate it and go away!

[sarkeizen]

How about we begin with just the fluorinated species 1st @sarkeizen: triamcinolone,fludrocortisone,fluicinolone

But you said...

The fluorinated,brominated,chlorinated corticosteroids (anti-inflammatories) classical example

How can these be "classical examples" of changing a molecule for no reason other than to maintain a patent.  If you can't find any examples of them?

LOL.

You also misspelled one drug and made at least one classification error not to mention that you can't seem to tell the difference between a drug and a class of drugs. :-)

[profitis]

 prove your statements to be true @sarkeizen,then we can believe you

[sarkeizen]

prove your statements to be true @sarkeizen,then we can believe you

Sorry you have never shown the slightest interest in supporting your own statements so you'll have to forgive me that I'm not that interested in talking to you but I'll give you a couple of hints...

triamcinolone fluocinolone fludrocortisone are the words you seem to be attempting to say.  Not even one of these words contains enough information to talk about a specific drug delivery.  The closest is fludrocortisone by which I'd assume you mean fludrocortisone acetate - often marketed under Florinef acetate but you could just as easily mean some other suspension.  The other two words get used in several drugs and one of them could be used to refer to a class of drugs containing drugs of both names.

The idea that there's no difference in medical utility between fludrocortisone acetate and something in the triamcinolone  acetonide class is laughable.  Almost as funny as asserting that there's no difference in medical utility between fludrocortisone and hydrocorosone types even though there's a very small chemical difference .