Free Energy prize money

[sarkeizen]

Mmm tempting mr sarkeizen tempting.I might do it if all else fails.I'm working on a formula for a clock right now.I think everlasting clocks,watches will be a hit and bring reasonable income

Excuses.  Dude I've offered a better hourly rate than anything you're currently working on.

And bayes rule only goes to where bayes rule is allowed to go for example,anybody can get rich by robbing a bank yet not many peeps rob banks(I think?)

Sorry that's actually the opposite of Bayes rule.  Robbing banks is not an expectation of people in general because a) Not everyone is physically capable of robbing a bank and b) Not everyone is mentally capable - i.e. people think robbing a bank is wrong c) It is high risk 60% of Bank robberies end in charges laid.

Whereas, according to you a) Everyone who took read a high-school chemistry book is mentally capable b) Virtually everyone is physically capable and c) There is a near zero chance of failure to produce an indisputable result.

Anyway, again thanks for letting people know that you're something of a fraud. :-)

[MarkE]

that-prophet would you kindly stop spamming threads with your rehashed unworkable scheme?

[profitis]

Quote frm sarkeizen:'Anyway, again thanks for letting people know that you're something of a fraud. :-)'

End quote

Except that you would be hard- pressed to find flaw with the laws of thermodynamics in order to substantiate this.gas concentration cells obey the rules,assymetricly.that is my assertion

[profitis]

Quote frm sarkeizen:'Whereas, according to you a) Everyone who took read a high-school chemistry book is mentally capable b) Virtually everyone is physically capable and c) There is a near zero chance of failure to produce an indisputable result.'


End quote

Absolutely

[sarkeizen]

Except that you would be hard- pressed to find flaw with the laws of thermodynamics in order to substantiate this.

I don't need to.  Bayes rule.  You have to reduce the probability of any hypothesis when it fails to meet the expectation.

Absolutely

Hence the situation I describe is a correct application of Bayes rule and yours was not. :-)