Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!


Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Free Energy prize money

Started by PaulLowrance, April 09, 2005, 11:44:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

sarkeizen

Quote from: allcanadian on January 02, 2015, 11:05:18 AM
Actually no, you do not define my number of choices
Not me.  Profits.  I'm just doing the math for him. 
Quote
In fact I would go so far as to say 95% of the billions you speak of can barely balance their check book so why would you presume they are intelligent enough to rationalize the concept of Energy in any meaningful way?
I didn't.  Profitis did. :) He said that it would be easy to demonstrate and OBVIOUS to anyone who read a high school chemistry text.  If true, you simply have to look at the number of candidates to realize that either he is lying about the number of candidates (which is the same as the difficulty in recognizing and demonstrating) OR we have an unmet expectation from a hypothesis and Bayes rule tells us (indirectly) in that case we must reduce the likelihood of that hypothesis .  :)

profitis

Quote frm sark:'Demonstrate and OBVIOUS to anyone who read a high school chemistry text.'

Bollox.I said anyone who noticed the discrepency between the front of the textbook and section on concentration cells but nevermind that because bayes has done its thing regardless of ambiguosity perspectives.ten thousand say this in journals,ten thousand say that in journals,the common theme remains unaltered,gross imbalance in entropy chekbooks,and bayes is finetuning that by the hour to less ambiguous precipitate

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on January 02, 2015, 07:35:23 PM
I said anyone who noticed the discrepency between the front of the textbook and section on concentration cells
Nope....and as usual your point is irrelevant...unless "noticing"  - whatever that means - is incredibly hard.  If it is, then you lied, there is no easy, clear and unambiguous proof - since that would involve "noticing" which is very hard all of a sudden. :)

If there is a easy, clear and unambiguous proof - then it's probably wrong. :)

Sorry you feel otherwise but this is how probability works. :)




profitis

Crap @sarkeizen.so you're saying that because only a few people notice electrons that electrons are fake?ambiguous?suspect?can't trust em?

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on January 02, 2015, 08:38:58 PM
Crap @sarkeizen.so you're saying that because only a few people notice electrons that electrons are fake?ambiguous?suspect?can't trust em?
Everyone notices electrons.  Charge a 200V 470uf capacitor and ask someone to touch the terminals.