Free Energy prize money

[profitis]

Quote'sorry, you have no knowledge or experience with journals.  So your opinion is pretty much worthless.'

End quote

Don't need experience to know that unambiguous ou-proof documents wont pass through judges.ambiguous ou documents will pass through judges like they always do.energy density unfortunately has a lot to do with proofs,energy density under a certain limit will always be open to blame on space-rays and remain ambiguous regardless of quality content (eg.foo's magneto- thermionics valve vs 2lot).energy density over a certain limit will be deemed too scary to allow in a journal.what do you think mr sarkeizen.what would those judges do faced with a horrifying ou-proof applicant.would they panic and reject the paper or would they panic and let the paper through...you say you have experience,tell us what they would do

[sarkeizen]

Don't need experience to know that unambiguous ou-proof documents wont pass through judges.

You have zero experience with the journal submission process.  So yeah, you actually do need to know something about it to be able to say what will and won't happen.

[profitis]

If the process becomes a panickess,that's what I'm talking about here because a panickess will be needed for unambiguosity

[sarkeizen]

If the process becomes a panickess

Again, you have so little experience with the process that none of your thoughts on it are important.   Especially when your thoughts don't contain real words.

So again, you either admit you lied about the difficulty or deal with your ideas being likely stupid...which they are...much like yourself.

[profitis]

Lol a textbook discrepency isnot an idea mr sarkeizen.its a discrepency,and it remains a discrepency until someone un-discrepensizes it