Overbalancing wheel

[Low-Q]

Hi all,

Here is the drawing from SPANG, and some text:

THE ALREADY OVERBALANCED WHEEL
                                   ______________________________

The object of THIS design, is to KEEP the already overbalanced wheel---------- overbalanced!

The amount of chain, in the nearly central set of 'wiggly' grooves, is the SAME amount of
chain in the 'outer' groove; they are the same length, and weigh the same amount ----------
only ONE chain though! There IS an extra amount of chain, leading from the nearly central
('wiggly') line of chain, to the 'outer' rim (top)----- the same amount of chain, but in reverse
order, applies to the bottom set-up.
The 'outer' rims' length of chain though, has a center of gravity FURTHER from the hub than the
nearly central set of 'wiggly' grooves ------------ it therefor, overbalances.
Some of the force generated BY this overbalancing, is used to transfer the two different 'sets'
of chain.
I HAVEN'T, AS YET, COME UP WITH A MECHANISM TO DO THE JOB. Maybe someone 'out there' can think
of something? I wouldn't lay money on it though!

As the device rotates, the amount of chain that is displaced by its rotation, is relaced AT THE
SAME TIME!   Top, & bottom.
This replacing of the chain, MAINTAINS the overbalancing.
The ONLY pieces of chain that actualy 'move', are the short lengths of chain, that do the
transfering!
The OTHER lengths of chain, DO rotate, but WITH the wheel, Not INDEPENDANT of it.
The chain is taken out of the center, or outer rim, with the rest of the chain STATIONARY.

[Low-Q]

Vidar: you should open up your mind, as they say there is none so blind as he who will not see!!! FACT there is no math formula that states that a gravity only wheel is impossible. If you took all the experiments that have been done to date, we would have barely scratched the surface , of how to get a gravity wheel to work!! Have you read about Bessler? I have , and its what changed my mind about gravity only wheels, before I was a BIG sceptic like you! Go Bill!!!

I totally agreed to be more open minded. People like you, and Bill, people who never give up the "impossible" have the spirit we all need. What I have said about gravity wheels, I still do believe is truth because of some obvious factors. Ofcourse, please do not let my words stop you guys from trying. Always fun to watch and learn.

Vidar

[SPANG]

Thanks Vidar,
                  Although we may not see 'eye to eye' on some things, I want you to know that I realy do
appreciate the time and effort you have put in -------- on BOTH our behalfs! THANKS.
Just like anyone, you have the right to your opinion --------- whether I agree, or not! Good Luck ---------
and I hope you're wrong!  (No disrespect.)

SPANG.         (BILL.)

[Dr]

Hi Jerry: Mainstream Science is still using that very lame crutch to lean on: "there has never been a wheel that can turn under its own power, therefore it is safe to say there never will be!" DUH! 100 years from now ,if mankind survives, people will say about this generation, "can you believe those Idiots, and how they wasted all those natural resources!!" There are millions upon millions of combinations to use weights and gravity in a wheel, and Jerry study History and you will see where many slaves ended up being the master, because the master "got lazy"

[onthecuttingedge2005]

you could always make the gravity wheel work off of a large grand father clock mechanism with weights and chains to reset the mechanisms functions to run on gravity but it still would require a slave driver, your hand resetting the weights every time it is about to run down.

the weight and chains of a clock mechanism is probably the most successful of all gravity assisted devices ever invented and it works.

Jerry