Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

Started by JouleSeeker, May 19, 2011, 11:21:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Shadesz

Sorry to distract. I have noticed some smart brained folks on this and the Gabriel thread. I was wondering if you guys could review this post I made about the Muller/Romero/Adams style generators. I am mostly looking for information about phase shifting... feel free to post on that thread or the Muller thread @ this forum. Thanks in advance.

http://www.energeticforum.com/157895-post1765.html

JouleSeeker

Quote from: Shadesz on September 19, 2011, 03:45:50 AM
Sorry to distract. I have noticed some smart brained folks on this and the Gabriel thread. I was wondering if you guys could review this post I made about the Muller/Romero/Adams style generators. I am mostly looking for information about phase shifting... feel free to post on that thread or the Muller thread @ this forum. Thanks in advance.

http://www.energeticforum.com/157895-post1765.html

Your post makes a lot of sense to me, David...  Several have been thinking along similar lines, I think, but you expressed it very clearly and cogently.
::cheers::

NerzhDishual


Hi Ou dot Com people,

Hey! I had my 'name' quoted by the very Prof. Steven Jones himself... I do not deserve such considerations.

BTW: Prof S. Jones, as you must know about it, articles propositions in magazines are just propositions.  It could change. But, who knows? In another issue, perhaps?
This was a private message. Anyway, thanks.

I'm just a lazy experimenter. I'm just also lost in this thread.

Anyway? Should we were at it...
Did Nul-point-the-misnomer(d?) tell about his charge conservation anomaly experiments? I made some similar experiments, with a kinda Joule Thief. We are not the only ones. See JL Naudin for ex.

Yes, non charge conservation. Just impossible. Something must be wrong somewhere. Sorry for disturbing.

Else: with a mere Joule Thief, I made some experiments.
I measured (with a black pipe) and a luxmeter some LUXs out given by 9 LEDs. I used a cheap 2 Euros 'torch'.

Unfortunately, as a bl' f' non scientist, I'm not able to convert LUXs to watts. Is it possible? I bet it is.

I just can say that my measurements were something like:

With 3 (exhausted) AAA  bats. Input (under load) = 4 volts * 150ma.  LUXs out: about 240.
With a simple Joule thief and a single (strong) AAA bat: 1.5 volts (under load) * 12 ma. LUXs out about 120.

Now, first case.
IN = 4 * 150 = 2400 mW
OUT LUX = 240.
So, for one LUX you have to give 2400/240 = 10 mW

Joule Thief case:
IN = 1.5 * 12 = 18 mW. Saying 20 mW
OUT LUX = 120.
So, for one LUX you have to give 20/120 = 0.17 mW. Saying O.20 mW

20/0.20 = 100! Or I'm I missing something?

Please note that my Joule Thief is just from a lazy experimenter.

Very Best







Nolite mittere margaritas ante porcos.

nul-points

Quote from: NerzhDishual on September 20, 2011, 11:52:48 PM
[...]
I'm just a lazy experimenter
[...]
IN = 4 * 150 = 2400 mW
[...]
So, for one [DC] LUX you have to give 2400/240 = 10 mW

[...]
So, for one [JT] LUX you have to give 20/120 = 0.17 mW. Saying O.20 mW

20/0.20 = 100! Or I'm I missing something?
[...]
Very Best


mr Dishual, usually i'd say that 'lazy' would be the last word to describe your very thorough replications

if one were to look for a word to describe a Breton musical-scientific-mariner then perhaps the word 'relaxed' would spring to mind  ;)

however...

"4*150 = 2400"  ?!?

and

"10 mW ['IF' 4 * 150 = 2400 ] divided by 0.20" = "20 / 0.20"  ?!?

this is scientific music which is new to me!


please may i have a glass of whatever you're drinking  :)

very best regards from little big Bretagne
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

tagor

Quote from: NerzhDishual on September 20, 2011, 11:52:48 PM


Unfortunately, as a bl' f' non scientist, I'm not able to convert LUXs to watts. Is it possible? I bet it is.


Pour "convertir" le flux lumineux (en lumen) en flux de puissance (en W) il faut que vous connaissiez l'efficacité lumineuse de votre source lumineuse (en général notée "k") ...

pour une lampe à incandescence classique k vaut de 8 à 13 lm.
pour un halogène k vaut environ 15 lm.
et pour un tube fluorescent k vaut de 40 à 100 lm.


PS :
sorry it is in french