PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

[nul-points]

 

  Thanks for the information and the INTRIGUING data-plots, NP.  I say Wow!

  @All:  Your input is requested on the following.

I have been invited to examine/validate an energy device -- which is great, just what I would like to do to help in this energy research effort.
BUT -- inventor seeks:

1.  Signed non-disclosure agreement, for 3 years or until marketed.  (He is seeking a patent, I understand.)
2.  Over $150,000 for a "non-exclusive license" so that I could proceed to build these devices, sell them, start a small company (which I already have) etc.
[...]

thanks Steven


wrt the 'approach by an inventor':

if step 1) is  independent of 2) then you can evaluate before deciding whether/how to proceed with step 2)

if step 1) costs then bail

if the device evaluates as genuine, then you have to decide if the sales-volume costing, which you would wish to see applied in order to make that product available in your 'countries of special interest', are viable whilst also paying you and any partners back your investment of $150,000

if not viable to get full payback of investment at that projected sales-volume,  then i'd say it's a choice between subsidising each unit to get it into the hands of a deserving recipient at an affordable price for them - or just not being able to support that level of subsidy and therefore not proceeding with 2)


in any case, nothing can happen until you've verified the technology through step 1) - this should be at no cost or other 'risk' to you (including foreign travel to 'view' a device)

caveat emptor


just my 2c
np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com

[Hope]

Do you think a bi-filar made with nano crystalline wire wound be better?  They make this wire just google it.  BTY looks as if Energy Forum has made headway on a COP > 1 device, the build stuff is available.

[JouleSeeker]

Thanks for the comments Jbig and NP --
NP:

"
if step 1) is  independent of 2) then you can evaluate before deciding whether/how to proceed with step 2)

I just found out (to my relief) that step 1 IS independent of step 2.  Also, inventor is working on a self-running device!  great! so I will wait and see what happens with that before going to my rich friend regarding step 2...    for sure. 

Do you think a bi-filar made with nano crystalline wire wound be better?  They make this wire just google it.  BTY looks as if Energy Forum has made headway on a COP > 1 device, the build stuff is available.

I like bi-filar winding as I described above -- note that there may be different definitions for this term.  @HOPE:  can you provide the link to the "energy forum" for a "COP>1 device" that you're talking about?  Thanks.

[Hope]

So someone has a device to license, great.  But this is an open source concept that finally gelled and with it your devices should work find.

I got a clear picture of what is going on with this natural sea of energy now.   Everything has a natural cohesion to like atoms (similar to water surface tension) But all wavelengths have it.  So when we disrupt it, it re-balances using it's own energy.  If we disrupt the electrical properties say using voltage spike (the higher the voltage the more energy types it disrupts, the more the potential differences the more the disruption).  Like the bigger the rock we throw in the pond the bigger the splash and not only in the water but splashes on the shores too.  So all we have to do to use this natural re-balancing energy which is coming thru the air (bad conductor) is provide it with a good conductor that doesn't become saturated (we have an antenna that is attached to a load which provides a path that is less resistant than the air) if it does become saturated there is no potential difference and the flow stops using it, and uses the air again or another less resistant path.  So HV disrupts the cohesion, this imbalance is a potential difference.  Nature flows to balance the potential difference, we make a path and work to keep this path less resistant than the air.  BINGO we get to use natural energy (of course we may have to keep the spark gap going to keep disruptions causing a potential difference).  Perhaps just the loads draw can keep it flowing??  Now this is how it is done and I believe we can all make devices using this principle.

Richard T. Williams   it only took me 50 years...

[nul-points]

[...]
BTY looks as if Energy Forum has made headway on a COP > 1 device, the build stuff is available.

hi Hope

are you referring to the "Use for the Tesla Switch" thread at EnergeticForum?:

     link-->http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/962-use-tesla-switch-120.html

thanks
np

http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com