Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Aether and what it is.

Started by jbignes5, July 26, 2011, 03:13:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

jbignes5

Quote from: aromaz on July 31, 2011, 09:34:48 AM
If you ever studied the vortex, you will fail to understand why modern astonomy can't understand the pulses/energy from black holes.  In reference to your water vortex, I will ask you one big question.  In referernce for answer see Viktor Schauberger - 'How does the trout become able to swim upstream, even up a waterfall?.  by the way, they do not 'jump' up.

In light of one of my current series of experiments - a vortex is NOT just like water flowing out a drain when you pull the plug.  There is also a counter flow in opposite direction.

As for polarity - there is actually no positive or negative; North or South.  Because of the wrong impression I nowadays understand why some older people prefered to use the terms of Male and Female. The one can't be without the other.  In your viewpoint there is always 'negative'?  Then negative must be monopole?

So you haven't seen the universe move like it is a fluid then????  Our space behaves much like water. what is below is the energy or charges that we float in. What is above is the "negative" or conductors of the positive. yes there is some of each on the bottom because they conduct positive charges or motion. The negative can be considered neutral if they don't have a charge in tow. They conduct the potential of the charge in tow and thats all the conductors do. They conduct over a much larger distance then the charges are capable of. This is how potentials are referenced: by a bridge (conductor). If that conductor was not present then all movement would seize because one charge would have no way to reference the other, even if they were right next to each other.

Of course there is a counter flow to the vortex but in our case that counter flow is merely the conductors moving away from the attractive potential as it looses the charge it was sheltering. Even in a tub you can hear the gurgling and suction as the water goes down the drain. That is a reverse flow but in the case of black holes there is no matter to react with so we don't "hear" that or even sense it because you can not sense these conductors(Aetheric).

By virtue of the shape of this conductor or vehicle it is a monopole. The base is always less in potential then the tip. This makes a bigger potential on the tip as opposed to the base. This is by virtue of the shape of this conductor. The pyramid is such a conductor shape. As Tesla figured out with conical coil they focus the energy from the base to the tip. Because the base has more surface area on that plane then when compared to the tip it in effect makes more potential given the surface area. Meaning the same potential but in a smaller area. The shape also gives these conductors the ability to travel much faster then a normal charge without a vehicle shaped like such. If space moves like a fluid in mass (all of space) then it must follow the laws of fluid dynamics like Tesla suspected.

Have you ever seen plasma's in the electrical sense? They are much like water and I suspect they are the final phase of matter and energy on the whole. This is the last phase change that matter can have and it's potential is way more then any other phase of matter and energy. With solids being the lowest.

Can you argue anything otherwise about the Tesla references I have stated like the Tesla switch. That is proof positive that two + potentials when connected together creates a flow that is useful and that does not deplete the source.

We have to understand that our views of the universe and simplistic energy has been screwed up but the inventions we current hold fast to. The model only describes that system we have designed and not the universe and how it operates. Thats why physics can not accurately describe anything beyond that system. On the other hand it describes accurately the system for which it was designed on. Thats system will never show OU in the least bit. At best it will only attain a balance in the perfect sense. While the Universal physics is based on a much different concept. The balance ability of the Universe is only based on the teeter tawter effect. With the pivot being the ambient measurement. When you change the density of one side the teeter tawter adjusts based on the the conductor or board layed across the pivot. This is the balancing effect of the medium of the Aether. It tends to want to balance with the ambient. Anything else needs energy of movement to compensates that imbalance. Like osmosis. The lowest end will draw in charges to compensate for the lack of charges from the ambient till it can attain the balance and the high end will tend to reverse the osmosis and bleed charges to the ambient till the density lowers. <thats a concept not fully understood by our science.

The whole reason we have cycles is because of this balancing mechanics that nature provides vie these conductors. It is why we can see great distances and it is the reason we can transmit signals trough space. It is what waves are in the medium of the Aether and we have mistaken these mechanics for Magnetism. It is the whole reason magnetism works and it completely explains gravity by the flow of this network twords a higher potential then the ambient of space. The flow is merely an attraction of the potential to a higher one just like in the Tesla experiments. And the flow is controllable through these attraction of potential to a higher one.

If we take this to a new level then you might understand the concept better. Lets take water in our space around our planet. if we scoop out a cup of water it gets replaced very very quickly by the ambient level of the water. If we merely slap our hand on the surface it will start to oscillate and continue to do so till the balancing mechanism of water and tension reduce the waves to the ambient again. This is all due the the network of charges that are around our potential in our planet flowing twords that central spot. It is a pressure flowing inwards and out the poles of our planet. And it is the reason we have an equator as well. The equator is the balance point. Either the in or out point. I havent figured out yet which it is. The resulting flows interact with the matter of our atmosphere and create complex cycles. One reliant on the other and ultimately reliant on the base interaction of the Aether. Even the magnetic flows around our world is created from this flow and it is why they are even there in the first place.

jbignes5

 Here is a good redition of what I am talking about. Don't read the story stuff below it and only pay attention to the picture.

http://archives.realvail.com/RealRhetoric/382/Creationism-deadly-black-holes-911-conspiracies-global-warming-hoaxes-and-other-myths-Part-II.html

If we look at the surface of the "Water" and think of the plume going up as a spray on what the black mass floating in it is spraying up then gets attracted back down twords the sea of energy we and it float in. Thats what turns it back to the surface then gets cycled back to the accelerator. I believe that maybe there is two guns. One pointing up from the plane of energy and the other pointing down. One plays with energy or charges and the other is a reaction of these conductors after releasing the charges they carry. When referencing one to the other one will be very heavy in density with energy and the other is depleted of energy. They could be considered opposites but there is no negative per say. Just an absence of positive or just the neutral(conductor) I referenced earlier.

If we then look at geysers on our own planet we can see the same action.

jbignes5


I wanted to talk more about Cymatics. Link:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cymatics

When we have a super fine medium like salt or sand that has a specific geometry to it's particles That geometry can bleed through and effect the mass of these particles. In this case the particles are pyramidal in shape or even the double ended version the Tetrahedron. Well that is the 6 sided version. I am thinking that is the correct number. The number 3 is very sacred in the ancient beliefs. So a double ended version would be the Tetrahedron.

More later

supersam

@j
tetrhedrons refer to ten sided geometric objects.  however, i agree that marco rodin's nine theories or threes as you might like to look at have alot of theoritical potential.

lol
sam
ps: keep the good work!

jbignes5

Really?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedron

Ok so if we look at the Sierpinski triangle That would be the 5 sided version with a square as a base and the 4 sided version which is a tetrahedron, we can see fractals come into the picture. We also see new rules from the Sierpinski triangle. These rules are based on curved verses sharp edges and how they align with other edges. This alignment is caused by the medium itself. The medium lines up with the much larger crystals allowing them to form bridges and apply force to keep those bridges aligned and together. This is because there is a potential difference between one base and another tip. With the edges being the nearest connection point when referenced to the base. It might be better to zoom into the picture of the square based pyramid(Sierpinski triangle, 3d version) to see how this would align.

I'm leaning on the 3 faced pyramid only because 3 and 6 are pretty important to the ancients. Almost every society has these as sacred. Even Christianity has the trinity or the 3 faces of God. And two would equal 6 or the double ended crystal. Remember that the double ended crystal has both the red and blue Sierpinski triangle (3d version).

Now is there any evidence in nature that this is exactly the numbers. Well yes...

Lets look at what I consider the condensed Aether(Conductor) water and how that works in nature when it freezes.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/Snowflake_-_Microphotograph_by_artgeek.jpg

Right here we have 6 conductors going twords the source junction. I believe this junction is 6 sided for only one reason. When a charge binds the two halves together the tips are generally the same polarity meaning they would self organize and the tips would push them away from each other. They both would have the same amount of charge from the source on the base because that area has nearly the same value. So the pyramids orient themselves with a 45 degree twist. If we then make a line around those bases you would see a Hexagon. The hexagon is made as the water gets attracted to the flow line approaching the network node of space. It rides this line much like water flowing down a thread. It beads up then slips down the thread or conductor line in a teardrop shape. When the water hits the nodes it sucks any charges out of the water and the water freezes in the shape we see in just about all snowflakes. Every picture we see of snowflakes have this geometry in the center with 6 radiating lines going out from there. I really think we are seeing a snapshot of this network when we look at snowflakes. because water is a low end phase changer it can and will take a picture of what is leeching these charges from the water.

If you are starting to think that water is the only proof then you are mistaken. Lets look at metals now. How about our favorite metal of choice when it comes to electronics. Copper:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cu-Scheibe.JPG

This is a copper disk that was etched with acid after making it in that form and it clearly shows the six sided geometry in it as well! If you were to continue you would notice that anything that has been formed through a phase change has this pattern in it to some degree.