Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS

Started by billmehess, August 12, 2011, 11:13:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jack Noskills

I have one comment regarding 'there is no such thing as OU' some people seem to think.

Just take look at Thane's BiTT. It has been verified by third party and it gives more out than goes in. Theory of operation is simple to understand and it is very easy to build. Even I managed to build one using scrap material and I got about 1.85 COP, 26 watts out for free. It feels nice to think that I was able to build a better transformer than any commercial trafo out there as they all have COP < 1.

But immediately this raises my concern, since OU is so simple, why I cannot buy OU trafos from my local store ? Surely OU trafo would be a successfull product and with a bit of tuning using better core materials a guaranteed success.

WilbyInebriated

Quote from: JouleSeeker on August 18, 2011, 02:01:37 AM
Sounds like a plan -- what do you think?
bill already has a plan... which is to demo it on the 31st.  -- i think you should stop behaving like an impetuous child, show a little patience and respect... and wait 'till the 31st... ::)
There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater...
the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public.  - Mr. Universe

ramset

No Steve
You need to ,Must ............Have to,
Look here

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/7982-muller-generator-replication-romerouk-42.html
Excerpt

The “transmission time” viewpoint allows us view the second assumption of Newton’s Third Law as an assumption of absolute time (or absolute simultaneity), if the action is at a distance. This assumption continues despite the reality that the “reaction” of a body to an externally applied force can not be simultaneous with the initial application (the “action”) of the external force. This profound restriction on Newton’s Law brings time into the equation -- a restriction which becomes the critical factor.

It should be noted that this concept of a non-simultaneous “reaction time” to an applied force (whatever the nature of that force is considered to be) is applicable not only in mechanics, but also in electromagnetism and other fields of physics. A sudden surge (an “action”) of current along a conductor, for example, will also result in an equal and opposite reaction -- but again not simultaneously. Likewise a rotating shaft surrounded by permanent magnets arranged so as to impel the rotation will encounter an equal and opposite magnetic force which will brake the rotation -- after a time delay, or what might be called the “Critical Action Time” (CAT)!

------------------

Holy Guacamole Boyz N girls [not sure we have any girls]

The posts of the last few days at the above site!!!
Cranky Pants Unveiled,[well that might be "scary"]

No ,its more like Now I get it
And so will you !!

Chet
PS
A discusion thread has been reignited here
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=827.msg16226;topicseen#msg16226

And at this Forum here
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=11312.msg298257#new

WOW
Toranarod
Elias
Shadesz
And Many others............
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

JouleSeeker

Thanks, Jack and Chet -- very encouraging.  "26 watts for free", Jack is to be congratulated, using "scrap materials".  Can you provide detail?  Again, replication is the key.

Quote from: Jack Noskills on August 18, 2011, 02:44:49 AM
I have one comment regarding 'there is no such thing as OU' some people seem to think.

Just take look at Thane's BiTT. It has been verified by third party and it gives more out than goes in. Theory of operation is simple to understand and it is very easy to build. Even I managed to build one using scrap material and I got about 1.85 COP, 26 watts out for free. It feels nice to think that I was able to build a better transformer than any commercial trafo out there as they all have COP < 1.

But immediately this raises my concern, since OU is so simple, why I cannot buy OU trafos from my local store ? Surely OU trafo would be a successfull product and with a bit of tuning using better core materials a guaranteed success.

  WillyInebriated -- you quoted me out of context.  I was seconding a commendable suggestion made by e2matrix,
QuoteE2matrix raises a very good idea, IMO -- a non-disclosure agreement that has a Limited Duration, so that the person agrees to stay quiet for a time, not forever.

  This is not a "childish" idea, but a commendable one.

FatBird

@ AguariuZ

I've checked my math and found it correct, to recap:

53 MICROwatts for Bill's 10-module system (connecting the 6-modules with the 4-modules). 

See below along with previous posts -- I have also checked from Bill's comments that the 280mV rise
in the 4900 uF cap took one hour for "the two sets of modules together in series".

But please correct me if my calculations are wrong, because, Bill and other friends,  this is a very VERY tiny effect:

1.  53 uW for 10 modules means about 5.3 microwatts/module (average)

2.  To reach just ONE watt would thus require about 189,000 modules.

3.  Earlier there was an indication that one could get the materials needed to build a module at a hardware store
     for less than $20.  OK, let's say just $10.

4.  Combining 2 and 3, we find that for ONE stinkin' watt it will cost roughly $1,890,000 -- nearly 2 million bucks ! 

5.  Let's take roughly 1 kW to run a house (a low estimate I believe) -- the cost for the modules (with present data)
     would be $1,890,000,000 or nearly $2 Billion bucks.  That's billion with a "B".

     I can't afford it.

=========================================================================

Excellent Points AguariuZ.
It sure looks like your math is right on target.

.