Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

[garrypm]

If he's happy with that, wait till he figures out using backing magnets

[synchro1]

If he's happy with that, wait till he figures out using backing magnets

The "Horseshoe Magnet Field" as Flynn demonstrates, has not only the power of each coil, but the power of a third invisable magnet. Muller builders turned to that "Back Magnet" trick when a "C" core with proper permeability, clamped around the outside, and connecting the opposing output coil cores with a magnetic flux path, would greatly increase the magnetic pole shift drag. The additional ferrite would by necessity slow the magnet rotor down untill threshold speed was attained and "Lenz Propulsion" commenced. Diametric cores work better then axial's at the core ends.

A tiny pancake coil seperating the C core in the center would be able to cut the field in two, or with current reversed, raise the field strengh, as patented by Hienrich Kunel.

[synchro1]

Here's what magnetic inductance looks like between counterwound coils. The L/H formula for Lenz delay threshokd does not  include the "B" field pole shift intereferance factor. The coil inductance remains the same, and a seperate factor emerges. The Henries over Ohms needs a "B" field coefficient to round it out. The magnetic density of the "B" field, measured in Tesla's, needs to be added to the L/H diividend. So it should read: L/H x T. One tesla is equal to 10⁴ gauss. It dosen't matter how the "B" field poles are set, so long as the domains are rigid in proportion to gauss in Teslas.. Tesla strength has no effect on inductance, and  needs to be included in the threshold formula as a distinct factor. MrAnguswangus could measure the effect simply by comparing the results of running only one coil.

                                                 "Domain Ridgity" = T. Pole shift reluctance.

[synchro1]

A fluxgate magnetometer consists of a small, magnetically susceptible core wrapped by two coils of wire. An alternating electrical current is passed through one coil, driving the core through an alternating cycle of magnetic saturation; i.e., magnetised, unmagnetised, inversely magnetised, unmagnetised, magnetised, and so forth. This constantly changing field induces an electrical current in the second coil, and this output current is measured by a detector. In a magnetically neutral background, the input and output currents will match. However, when the core is exposed to a background field, it will be more easily saturated in alignment with that field and less easily saturated in opposition to it. Hence the alternating magnetic field, and the induced output current, will be out of step with the input current. The extent to which this is the case will depend on the strength of the background magnetic field. Often, the current in the output coil is integrated, yielding an output analog voltage, proportional to the magnetic field. Here's a video on theL/H formula from the archives:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OufL9ssiyjM&list=UUDz1_S1kOhi9nYZB0KV7znA

[DeepCut]

I've finished a very raw version (CLI) of my virtual coil builder program.

You give it the coil-former dimensions, the wire gauge and resistance per metre and the target number of turns.

It gives you the resistance, inductance, number of layers blah, blah ...

I've tested it against 7 actual coils and the results are very good.

I want to stick a GUI on it so that it is nice and friendly for testing.

I will use BlitzPlus, very easy to use, good for knocking something up quickly, free for a short while.

Get BlitzPlus from the following link :

www.blitzbasic.com/Products/_index_.php

You won't need BP to run the compiled program but you will need it to control the source.


Cheers,

DC.