Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

[conradelektro]

The Magnacoaster effect generates the power, not a free spinning magnet. The Magnet should be stationary! Low threshold Lenz free r.p.m.

@synchro: Again for the stupid ones like me.

How do you want the magnet inside the bifilar coil? Please see my drawing. Type A or Type B or am I completely wrong?

You say "the magnet should be stationary". Does it mean, the ring magnet is fixed inside the bifilar coil like a core?

Greetings, Conrad

[synchro1]

@synchro: Again for the stupid ones like me.

How do you want the magnet inside the bifilar coil? Please see my drawing. Type A or Type B or am I completely wrong?

You say "the magnet should be stationary". Does it mean, the ring magnet is fixed inside the bifilar coil like a core?

Greetings, Conrad

Type "A'. A snug fit is best. It's O.K to wedge something in there, like a flat toothpick.

[DeepCut]

Your picture A is the correct one.

Asking questions isn't dumb


atb,

DC.

[synchro1]

The PM fields are at right angles to the wire coil's axial poles. The Magnetic Interferance is strong enough to delay the rotor induced pole shift in the spindle coil. This is above the delay threshold r.p.m's, nothing for a bearingless spinner. Multiple magnets can gain with a really good bearing like the VCR type, but it requires a feat of engineering to balance.

[conradelektro]

@synchro1 and DeepCut: thank you for the answers, that clarified a lot.

A attached a picture taken from the latest video of skycollection with two questions.

What do you think?

Are the magnets in skycollection's rotor S N S N  or S S S S or N N N N ? Does it matter?

Using synchro1's (I called them Type A) coils instead of skycollection's coils? Would it work?

Greetings, Conrad