Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!


Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

Started by chessnyt, September 16, 2011, 06:57:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

The new poll  starting 2-4-2012:  LENR technology

a) will soon lead to the end of the fossil fuel era and become the new standard.
b) will compete with fossil fuels for decades to come eventually replacing them.
c) will not only phase out fossil fuels but will also lead to the trials of the current corrupt powers in charge.
d) will lead to all of the above.

teslaalset

Gwandau,
I understand your concerns, but I have a bit of a different view on them.
There are two parties you mentioned:
- The first 1MW unit buyer
- The investors in Leonardo Corperation

The fact that the first 1MW buyer wants to remain anonymous is understandable in my view.
He's investing 1M$ in something that was (and maybe still is) highly speculative.
- His reputation maybe at stake as an investor in case Rossi's claims are far from the real situation.
- There maybe opponents that want to frustrate his willingness to stick out his neck to invest in LERN.
These are two quite understandable reasons to remain anonymous at this stage.

With respect to Leonardo Corp, Rossi is in a nasty situation:
Severe competition is around (Defkalion) and Rossi needs to keep the paste to enter the market with large volumes to get some money back that he personally invested.
If he wants to do this on his own, he's simply not able to ramp up that paste, because setting up a factory requires serious amounts of money.
So, its either choose to do this all with small money and have a slow market introduction, or do this the way he's planning it, with some investors and loose some control of it all.

I am sure Rossi has a legal advisor and made sure he's still having > 50% of the ownership of Leonardo Corp.
There must be hundreds of investors willing to invest, so Rossi can just pick the ones that are willing to work with him under minority share.

It's good to see some difference in optimism and opinions.

teslaalset

Some more on NI<>Leonardo Corp.:
http://e-catsite.com/2012/02/21/ni-corroborates-rossi-statements/

My personal view is that Defkalion seems to perfectly cope without the help of NI.
Rossi obtained the help of NI in the initial phase of defining a good control mechanism for his LENR process.
For the mass production obviously cheeper solutions are available.
So, I see the cooperation with NI as a one off consultancy deal that has been completed.
It was never stated anywhere that NI components would be used in the final products.

teslaalset


e2matrix

Good articles teslaalset.   Nice to see National Instruments validated their work with Rossi and that they expressed interest in the value of his technology.  Cline's article was fun to read too - rather hilarious at times but possibly the way a lot of things could happen. 

teslaalset

An excellent analysis of measurements on steam, related to the COP calculations on the e-cat experiments:
http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_steam_frames_v410H.php

It's hard to conclude whether the public e-cat steam analysis are correct or not, but in my view enough room for Rossi to be correct.